Rich Smrcina wrote:
Interesting. That sort of smacks in the face of all reasonableness.
I really like this para:
"Here we have a clear-cut winner. The LVM ran 30% faster, achieved a 25%
higher transaction per second rate, scored 56% faster on kilobytes per
second and had a 108% better average
: Linux on 390 Port
11/17/2008 07:02 PM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
To
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Oracle sites using ASM
Are there sites running Oracle on Linux on System z that are also using
ASM (Automatic
Storage Management).
If so, did you compare the performance of
Interesting. That sort of smacks in the face of all reasonableness.
Thanks!
Richard Gasiorowski wrote:
Rich
Here is a site with some great information. Granted not done on system z
but if it were I would suspect the same performance ratio differences.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/853
y: Linux on 390 Port
11/17/2008 07:02 PM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
To
LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Oracle sites using ASM
Are there sites running Oracle on Linux on System z that are also using
ASM (Automatic
Storage Management).
If so, did you compare the performance of A
Are there sites running Oracle on Linux on System z that are also using ASM
(Automatic
Storage Management).
If so, did you compare the performance of ASM against a similar configuration
with LVM?
What did you measure it with and what were the results?
Thanks.
--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
P
