Re: Redhat 2.4.9 w/OCO installed in RAMDISK system

2002-01-16 Thread Rob van der Heij
> then IPL that full 2.4.9 system to build my "on-pack IPL disk". You want a single disk with all the rpm packages that can be booted as well, right? Must it be a CMS reserved mini disk for shipping? If not, then I think it would be an interesting experiment to see if you can make the disk in OS

Re: Redhat 2.4.9 w/OCO installed in RAMDISK system

2002-01-16 Thread Post, Mark K
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Redhat 2.4.9 w/OCO installed in RAMDISK system In a message dated 1/16/2002 11:00:36 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I believe you should be specifying "eth0" since it is an Ether

Re: Redhat 2.4.9 w/OCO installed in RAMDISK system

2002-01-16 Thread Dave Myers
In a message dated 1/16/2002 11:00:36 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I believe you should be specifying "eth0" since it is an Ethernet device. > duh...thanks that worked and my osa card is working now for the RH 2.4.9 ramdisk system. Am I on the right track of thinking

Re: Redhat 2.4.9 w/OCO installed in RAMDISK system - getting LCS unknown device

2002-01-16 Thread Post, Mark K
I believe you should be specifying "eth0" since it is an Ethernet device. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Dave Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Redhat 2.4.9 w/OCO installed in RAMDISK system - g

Redhat 2.4.9 w/OCO installed in RAMDISK system - getting LCS unknown device

2002-01-16 Thread Dave Myers
I IPL'd the Redhat 2.4.9 RAMDISK system (with the OCO code applied). I thought I could reply to the script with "lcs0" Is this not the way to do this? My parmfile has this: root=/dev/ram0 ro ip=off ramdisk_size=9216 CHANDEV=lcs0,0x200,0x201