On 1/16/09 9:04 AM, "Gentry, Stephen"
wrote:
> Let's take this in a different direction for a moment (a.k.a. OT)
> Disregard the VDISK usage for a moment. The swap disk will be on a
> mini-disk. What are the advantages (or disadvantages) of IPL'ing the
> boot disk in the directory vs IPL'ing cm
Stephen Gentry wrote:
> I'm trying to keep storage usage "lean and mean" so IPL'ing CMS
> seems to add an extra layer.
Only for a few seconds. Then the storage CMS used is gone. Although if
there were few other guests running CMS, it could cause your CMS DCSS to
be briefly paged in.
Douglas Wo
On Friday, 01/16/2009 at 09:23 EST, "van Sleeuwen, Berry"
wrote:
> I let the guest setup some environment settings before it will boot the
> linux itself. Settings like PF-keys, RUN, EMSG, MSG, CHARDEL and indeed
> the VDISK setup. You could argue if these settings couldn't be changed
> from withi
I let the guest setup some environment settings before it will boot the
linux itself. Settings like PF-keys, RUN, EMSG, MSG, CHARDEL and indeed
the VDISK setup. You could argue if these settings couldn't be changed
from within the linux boot process but then I'd have to include these
commands in al
Let's take this in a different direction for a moment (a.k.a. OT)
Disregard the VDISK usage for a moment. The swap disk will be on a
mini-disk. What are the advantages (or disadvantages) of IPL'ing the
boot disk in the directory vs IPL'ing cms, doing some stuff in a profile
exec and then IPL'ing
