or consolidated servers.
-- db
David Boyes
Sine Nomine Associates
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Lionel Dyck
> Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 12:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Samba - 1 for 1 or 'n'
>-Original Message-
>From: Lionel Dyck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Is it better to do a one for one (windows server to linux samba server) or
>to take some number of windows servers into a single samba server?
Unless there was a particular reason for having several individual windows
serv
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, Post, Mark K wrote:
> Lionel,
>
> >From the end-user's perspective, it's better if they don't have to change
> anything on their end. If you turn off a Windows server, and fire it up on
> Linux/390 with the same netbios name, when the users come in on Monday, if
> everything
al Message-
From: Lionel Dyck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 12:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Samba - 1 for 1 or 'n' to 1
When doing a file/print server consolidation using Samba what is the
recommended approach?
Is it better to do a one for one (windo
When doing a file/print server consolidation using Samba what is the
recommended approach?
Is it better to do a one for one (windows server to linux samba server) or
to take some number of windows servers into a single samba server?
thx
