Tom Huegel píše v St 30. 01. 2013 v 06:43 -0800:
> Just an FYI.. XRDP works fine now on s390x..after Dans update
thanks for testing
Dan
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Tom Huegel wrote:
>
> > Thanks Dan, that was quick.. Hopefully I can get to it later today.
> > Tom
> >
> > On Tue, Ja
Just an FYI.. XRDP works fine now on s390x..after Dans update
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Tom Huegel wrote:
> Thanks Dan, that was quick.. Hopefully I can get to it later today.
> Tom
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
>
>> Tom Huegel píše v Út 29. 01. 2013 v 04:38 -080
Thanks Dan, that was quick.. Hopefully I can get to it later today.
Tom
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> Tom Huegel píše v Út 29. 01. 2013 v 04:38 -0800:
> > Yes Dan you are correct.
>
> reported as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905411
> and fixed rpm is availabl
Tom Huegel píše v Út 29. 01. 2013 v 04:38 -0800:
> Yes Dan you are correct.
reported as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905411
and fixed rpm is available from
http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=155092
it will hit official updates in a week or two
Dan
> On Tue
Yes Dan you are correct.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> Mauro Souza píše v Út 29. 01. 2013 v 08:40 -0200:
> > I suspect the build routine failed to identify the correct architecture
> and
> > got the wrong endian in this case.
> > A bug report should be filled so the devs ca
Mauro Souza píše v Út 29. 01. 2013 v 08:40 -0200:
> I suspect the build routine failed to identify the correct architecture and
> got the wrong endian in this case.
> A bug report should be filled so the devs can fix it upstream.
it can be only the package is built wrong. I'll file a bug. Tom, I
I suspect the build routine failed to identify the correct architecture and
got the wrong endian in this case.
A bug report should be filled so the devs can fix it upstream.
On Jan 28, 2013 9:24 PM, "Tom Huegel" wrote:
> [root@fedora ~]# file $(which xrdp)
> /usr/sbin/xrdp: ELF 64-bit MSB executa
Mauro - That looks like work, I thought this was supposed to be fun.-:) ..
I'll give give it a try tomorrow and see what happens. Thanks
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Mauro Souza wrote
>
> On xrdp mailing list, there's something about it:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/xrdp-devel@lists.sourcefo
On xrdp mailing list, there's something about it:
http://www.mail-archive.com/xrdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00278.html
It is because the auto endianess detection is not working properly. If you
download the source, grep-it for B_ENDIAN, define the endianess on the
files as that link suggests
[root@fedora ~]# file $(which xrdp)
/usr/sbin/xrdp: ELF 64-bit MSB executable, IBM S/390, version 1 (SYSV),
dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32,
BuildID[sha1]=0x19349e681c19dd5c9ecb97a9760eb42ef43c75ee, stripped
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:14 PM, John McKown
wrote:
> Can you
Can you do a
file $(which xrdp)
I'll almost bet that xrdp is not zSeries. Probably x86.
On Jan 28, 2013 5:01 PM, "Tom Huegel" wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what this error is? I can't find it anywhere.
>
> [root@fedora ~]# xrdp -k
> endian wrong, edit arch.h
>
> Thanks
>
> --
Can anyone tell me what this error is? I can't find it anywhere.
[root@fedora ~]# xrdp -k
endian wrong, edit arch.h
Thanks
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu
> Can anyone tell me what this error is? I can't find it anywhere.
> [root@fedora ~]# xrdp -k
> endian wrong, edit arch.h
Somehow you've gotten a non-Z binary installed, or something is wrong in the
definition of the architecture byte order in arch.h.
I suspect the former (which would explain xrd
13 matches
Mail list logo
