Just saw this on /.
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/02/1232235mode=nestedtid=106tid=126tid=156tid=185
(ewww, watch for wrap or skip to the real info)
The Xen virtual machine monitor:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/
- Mike
]
-Original Message-
From: Mike Grundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: XEN. Interesting, following the VMWARE thread
Just saw this on /.
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/02/1232235mode=nestedt
id=106tid
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: XEN. Interesting, following the VMWARE thread
Hi Mike,
Thanks much for the info, looks interesting. My immediate concern,
however,
would be the fact that the operating systems that run under
Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission wrote:
Although the page is a little hard to understand, I think the 'ported' OS is
the one that runs XEN. The guest operating systems would appear to be fairly
standard, although it appears that special device drivers would be required.
Hmm.. I would say the
: Re: XEN. Interesting, following
the VMWARE thread
on 390 Port
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ARIST.EDU
10/02/2003
01:02 PM
Please respond
to Linux on 390
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 13:57, Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission
wrote:
I think the 'ported' OS is the one that runs XEN
No, the guest OS must be ported. Xen runs in ring 0, guests run in ring
1. Linux has been ported (2000+ lines of code change), XP has an
incomplete port (4700 LOC and
