Re: gnupg 2.0.1

2007-01-12 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Don't go too far with any praise. If I would have thought about it and if it was on the Novell maintenance site, I would have pulled the binaries. Perhaps I jumped the gun. When I saw that it was 'source only', I didn't hesitate to "try my hand" at a source only install. I've done little things

Re: gnupg 2.0.1

2007-01-11 Thread Rick Troth
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Tom Duerbusch wrote: > So, I decided to download and install 2.0.1. This is a source install > and you have to compile everything. ... I tip my hat, sir! Some recommend building as much as you can. Consider your support contracts, of course. But the value in building it y

Re: [was gnupg 2.0.1] - WAS and SLES10?

2007-01-10 Thread Marcy Cortes
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Melin Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 6:08 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [LINUX-390] [was gnupg 2.0.1] - WAS and SLES10? Hi Marcy! Just Curious.Where have you seen an IBM announcement that WAS version 6 or higher supports SLES 10. We've be

Re: gnupg 2.0.1

2007-01-10 Thread Tom Duerbusch
I initially keyed it in as "picky". After I finished keying the email, I went back and changed it to "pickey". When I said the word to myself, slowly, "pic","key","pic","key","pic","key", I changed it. So certain, that I didn't need to hit the spellcheck button . Thanks Tom Duerbusch THD Consu

Re: [was gnupg 2.0.1] - WAS and SLES10?

2007-01-09 Thread Marian Gasparovic
; cc > 01/09/2007 12:01 AM > > > Subject > > Re: gnupg 2.0.1 > Please respond to >

Re: [was gnupg 2.0.1] - WAS and SLES10?

2007-01-09 Thread Michael MacIsaac
James, all, > Just Curious.Where have you seen an IBM announcement > that WAS version 6 or higher supports SLES 10. We've > been waiting for that particular information. I forwarded this question to a Guy Who Knows and he sent me this: WAS 6.0.2 supported SLES 10 as of October 13, 2006. Ple

[was gnupg 2.0.1] - WAS and SLES10?

2007-01-09 Thread James Melin
.MARIST.EDU cc 01/09/2007 12:01 AM Subject Re: g

Re: gnupg 2.0.1

2007-01-09 Thread Mary Anne Matyaz
Not to be picky, but, I think it's picky, not pickey. "picky." *Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)*. Random House, Inc. 09 Jan. 2007. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/picky> MA On 1/8/07, Tom Duerbusch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Pickey, pickey, pickeyone little character . Thanks,

Re: gnupg 2.0.1

2007-01-08 Thread John Summerfield
didn't look at SLES10. However, GnuPG 2.0.1 just came out in late December 2006. So I doubt the base SLES10 would have had a V2. I've just installed SLED10 from a magazine DVD. It's version 1.4.2. 3. Right now, I'm pretty dedicated to SLES 9. When Oracle 10g and DB2/UDB

Re: gnupg 2.0.1

2007-01-08 Thread Tom Duerbusch
.4. > I couldn't fine documentation that I needed, but I did find good > documentation for gnupg 2.0.1. While you're going through the trouble to compile your own GPG, you should go back and get the latest release. It's good that you're upgrading, but you should conside

Re: gnupg 2.0.1

2007-01-08 Thread Marcy Cortes
f Tom Duerbusch Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 6:52 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] gnupg 2.0.1 None of your business? I don't know...but good topic. 1. I don't think it is an issue with a support contract. Ours use to be directly with SUSE, but now it is

Re: gnupg 2.0.1

2007-01-08 Thread Tom Duerbusch
e thought about it. 2. I didn't look at SLES10. However, GnuPG 2.0.1 just came out in late December 2006. So I doubt the base SLES10 would have had a V2. 3. Right now, I'm pretty dedicated to SLES 9. When Oracle 10g and DB2/UDB are certified for SLES10, I will be ready for an upg

Re: gnupg 2.0.1

2007-01-08 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Pickey, pickey, pickeyone little character . Thanks, that was it. Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/5/2007 4:17 PM >>> On 1/5/07, Tom Duerbusch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > compress.o(.text+0x238): In function `compress_filter': > /ho

Re: gnupg 2.0.1

2007-01-08 Thread Mark Boltz
Tom, > In SLES9, the gpg is at 1.2.4. > I couldn't fine documentation that I needed, but I did find good > documentation for gnupg 2.0.1. While you're going through the trouble to compile your own GPG, you should go back and get the latest release. It's good that you'

Re: gnupg 2.0.1

2007-01-07 Thread Mark Post
ed, then install libz-devel. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tom Duerbusch Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 6:01 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: gnupg 2.0.1 Different set of errors with "make LDFLAGS=lz": Making all in

Re: gnupg 2.0.1

2007-01-07 Thread John Summerfield
Tom Duerbusch wrote: In SLES9, the gpg is at 1.2.4. I couldn't fine documentation that I needed, but I did find good documentation for gnupg 2.0.1. So, I decided to download and install 2.0.1. This is a source install and you have to compile everything. Of course, I have the default in

Re: gnupg 2.0.1

2007-01-05 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Different set of errors with "make LDFLAGS=lz": Making all in kbx make[2]: Entering directory `/home/gpg20/gnupg-2.0.1/kbx' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/gpg20/gnupg-2.0.1/kbx' Making all in g10 make[2]: Entering directory `/h

Re: gnupg 2.0.1

2007-01-05 Thread Eric Covener
On 1/5/07, Tom Duerbusch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: compress.o(.text+0x238): In function `compress_filter': /home/gpg20/gnupg-2.0.1/g10/compress.c:222: undefined reference to `inflateInit2_' compress.o(.text+0x23c):/home/gpg20/gnupg-2.0.1/g10/compress.c:222: undefined reference

gnupg 2.0.1

2007-01-05 Thread Tom Duerbusch
In SLES9, the gpg is at 1.2.4. I couldn't fine documentation that I needed, but I did find good documentation for gnupg 2.0.1. So, I decided to download and install 2.0.1. This is a source install and you have to compile everything. Of course, I have the default install for SLES9, which d