Don't go too far with any praise.
If I would have thought about it and if it was on the Novell
maintenance site, I would have pulled the binaries.
Perhaps I jumped the gun. When I saw that it was 'source only', I
didn't hesitate to "try my hand" at a source only install. I've done
little things
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
> So, I decided to download and install 2.0.1. This is a source install
> and you have to compile everything. ...
I tip my hat, sir!
Some recommend building as much as you can. Consider your
support contracts, of course. But the value in building it y
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
James Melin
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 6:08 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [LINUX-390] [was gnupg 2.0.1] - WAS and SLES10?
Hi Marcy!
Just Curious.Where have you seen an IBM announcement that WAS
version 6 or higher supports SLES 10. We've be
I initially keyed it in as "picky". After I finished keying the email,
I went back and changed it to "pickey". When I said the word to myself,
slowly, "pic","key","pic","key","pic","key", I changed it.
So certain, that I didn't need to hit the spellcheck button .
Thanks
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consu
; cc
> 01/09/2007 12:01 AM
>
>
> Subject
>
> Re: gnupg 2.0.1
> Please respond to
>
James, all,
> Just Curious.Where have you seen an IBM announcement
> that WAS version 6 or higher supports SLES 10. We've
> been waiting for that particular information.
I forwarded this question to a Guy Who Knows and he sent me this:
WAS 6.0.2 supported SLES 10 as of October 13, 2006. Ple
.MARIST.EDU
cc
01/09/2007 12:01 AM
Subject
Re: g
Not to be picky, but, I think it's picky, not pickey.
"picky." *Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)*. Random House, Inc. 09 Jan.
2007. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/picky>
MA
On 1/8/07, Tom Duerbusch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pickey, pickey, pickeyone little character .
Thanks,
didn't look at SLES10. However, GnuPG 2.0.1 just came out in late
December 2006. So I doubt the base SLES10 would have had a V2.
I've just installed SLED10 from a magazine DVD. It's version 1.4.2.
3. Right now, I'm pretty dedicated to SLES 9. When Oracle 10g and
DB2/UDB
.4.
> I couldn't fine documentation that I needed, but I did find good
> documentation for gnupg 2.0.1.
While you're going through the trouble to compile your own GPG, you
should
go back and get the latest release. It's good that you're upgrading,
but
you should conside
f
Tom Duerbusch
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 6:52 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] gnupg 2.0.1
None of your business? I don't know...but good topic.
1. I don't think it is an issue with a support contract. Ours use to
be directly with SUSE, but now it is
e thought about it.
2. I didn't look at SLES10. However, GnuPG 2.0.1 just came out in late
December 2006. So I doubt the base SLES10 would have had a V2.
3. Right now, I'm pretty dedicated to SLES 9. When Oracle 10g and
DB2/UDB are certified for SLES10, I will be ready for an upg
Pickey, pickey, pickeyone little character .
Thanks, that was it.
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/5/2007 4:17 PM >>>
On 1/5/07, Tom Duerbusch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> compress.o(.text+0x238): In function `compress_filter':
> /ho
Tom,
> In SLES9, the gpg is at 1.2.4.
> I couldn't fine documentation that I needed, but I did find good
> documentation for gnupg 2.0.1.
While you're going through the trouble to compile your own GPG, you should
go back and get the latest release. It's good that you'
ed, then install libz-devel.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tom
Duerbusch
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 6:01 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: gnupg 2.0.1
Different set of errors with "make LDFLAGS=lz":
Making all in
Tom Duerbusch wrote:
In SLES9, the gpg is at 1.2.4.
I couldn't fine documentation that I needed, but I did find good
documentation for gnupg 2.0.1.
So, I decided to download and install 2.0.1. This is a source install
and you have to compile everything. Of course, I have the default
in
Different set of errors with "make LDFLAGS=lz":
Making all in kbx
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/gpg20/gnupg-2.0.1/kbx'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/gpg20/gnupg-2.0.1/kbx'
Making all in g10
make[2]: Entering directory `/h
On 1/5/07, Tom Duerbusch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
compress.o(.text+0x238): In function `compress_filter':
/home/gpg20/gnupg-2.0.1/g10/compress.c:222: undefined reference to
`inflateInit2_'
compress.o(.text+0x23c):/home/gpg20/gnupg-2.0.1/g10/compress.c:222:
undefined reference
In SLES9, the gpg is at 1.2.4.
I couldn't fine documentation that I needed, but I did find good
documentation for gnupg 2.0.1.
So, I decided to download and install 2.0.1. This is a source install
and you have to compile everything. Of course, I have the default
install for SLES9, which d
19 matches
Mail list logo