---
From: Geoff O'Callaghan [mailto:gocallag@;au1.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: quick check on potential 2.4.19 problem
G'day Mark,
No, we don't have device nodes for /dev/dasd{ etc. How we noticed it was
that we had an LVM gr
' playing a big role
here.
Thanks
Geoff
"Post, Mark K"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m> cc:
Sent by: Linux on Subject: Re: quick chec
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Geoff O'Callaghan [mailto:gocallag@;au1.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: quick check on potential 2.4.19 problem
G'day,
I'm just doing a quick check to see if anyone has seen this problem b
G'day,
I'm just doing a quick check to see if anyone has seen this problem before
doing some detailed research or if it's something that I've broken all by
myself :-)
We've just upgraded a SLES7 server to 2.4.19. Our zipl.conf has disk
defined as :
dasd=0101,0201-0208,020f,0301-0308,0401-0408,05
