On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 10:06:25PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:59:55 -0800
> "O'Brien, Dennis L" wrote:
>
> > We have been informed by an Oracle rep "that Oracle does not certify its
> > programs on any Virtualization Software (to include VMware and zVM.)"
>
> http://www.compute
; From: shogunx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 4:28 AM
> > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Subject: Re: your mail
> >
> > perhpas a more complete description of your problem would help?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Aug 2005,
life?
::insert witty snippet of code here::
> -Original Message-
> From: shogunx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 4:28 AM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: your mail
>
> perhpas a more complete description of your problem would
perhpas a more complete description of your problem would help?
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, John Summerfied wrote:
> cox, gary wrote:
> > help
>
> I'm helpless
>
>
> --
>
> Cheers
> John
>
> -- spambait
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 23:45, Guillaume Morin wrote:
> The problem is still the number of available minor numbers. If I am not
> mistaken, the kernel gives 4 minor numbers for one dasd. This means you
> can mount at the same time 255/4 = 63 disks. You can still play with the
> kernel ignore
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:39:00PM -0500, John Rowland wrote:
> 1 - Do I need to be concerned about differences between Linux distributions?
> I.e. if I get it to work under SuSE will it work on RedHat or Debian assuming
> the kernel level is the same or compatible?
If the C library levels are th
See: http://linuxvm.org/present/SHARE100/S9333NFa.pdf,
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpapers/pdfs/redp0205.pdf,
"http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/docu/lx24j
un03dd01.pdf"
-Original Message-
Can you explain me briefly how you can do that ? I am really interes
Mark,
Dans un message du 23 sep ` 17:59, Post, Mark K icrivait :
> You can have multiple major numbers used for DASD devices,
Oh yeah, I missed that.
> but my point was to avoid using DASD at all, and use straight SCSI to
> the storage array.
Can you explain me briefly how you can do that ? I a
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: your mail
Dans un message du 23 Sep ` 17:01, Post, Mark K icrivait :
> 3 - It's already been done with FCP support. Systems can access
> storage arrays "natively" without going through that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 3390-emulation layer any longer.
Dans un message du 23 Sep ` 17:01, Post, Mark K icrivait :
> 3 - It's already been done with FCP support. Systems can access
> storage arrays "natively" without going through that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 3390-emulation layer any longer. (I'm assuming you meant 3390 and not
> 3380 as you typed it.) A
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, James Tison wrote:
> Sadly and wholeheartedly agreed. Nice mail UID :-)
Not my idea, feel free to pinch it;-))
I heard that address harvesters ignore it.
The plan is that if spam to this address becomes a problem, then I will
filter out email not from the lists it's subscri
|
| cc:
|
cates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Jim Sibley
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 7:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] your mail
>
> John wrote:
>
> >I d
John wrote:
>I don't suppose anyone with any sense thinks you
speak >_for_ IBM (except when you say you do), but
it's nice to > know someone speaks with _knowledge_ of
IBM.
Unfortunately, even on this forum, some people do not
make the distinction. You owuld be surprised what I
get in my official
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Jim Sibley wrote:
> I wasn't speaking for IBM or some of the choices (eBay, what). Personally,
> there is NO microsoft product in my home! Looks like I'll have to change my
> subscription to my home email :-)
I don't suppose anyone with any sense thinks you speak _for_ IBM (e
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, McKown, John wrote:
>
> Just a comment on my part. Before trying to install Linux on your IBM
> mainframe, I'd strongly suggest that you get the company to give you a spare
> PC and install the same Linux distribution on it before trying to install on
> the mainframe. That's j
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Ferguson, Neale wrote:
Didn't anyone ever tell you to use a subject?;-)
> I am a C++ dummy so can any one tell me what I should look for to fix the
> following. The code says:
>
> void CallStack::Output(ostream &os)
> {
>
> total_time = data.total_time();
>
> for (Pr
Jim:
DEFINE CPU does not cause a reset. CPUs can be added dynamically, just
like the real hardware. Maybe you're thinking of DETACH CPU, which
does cause a reset.
Romney
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:11:39 EDT Jim Elliott said:
>From: Nish Deodhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Addition of new CPUs
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Eric Lawler wrote:
> Can anyone tell me if there is a SuSe 7.x distribution with a 2.4 kernel
> available.
> My UNIX colleague is struggling to find one.
The SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 7 uses the 2.4 kernel if I'm correct.
Regards,
Tim
--
===
FYI. The compiler update did fix the problem.
I was able to update my Hercules-emulated S/390 setup with the later
RPMs and recompile to verify that the bug no longer reproduces.
However, because ihost.com installs their Linux/390 with the /usr
sub-tree mounted read-only, I could not verify the
Stephen Dennis wrote:
>Two setups:
>
>- Hercules setups: SuSE 7.0 GA
> (ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/s390/suse-us-s390)
>- http://www.zSeriesPenguins.ihost.com with the SuSE option.
>
>In both cases, the compiler comes with the distribution.
OK, I've found the bug; it is a known problem which we
Two setups:
- Hercules setups: SuSE 7.0 GA
(ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/s390/suse-us-s390)
- http://www.zSeriesPenguins.ihost.com with the SuSE option.
In both cases, the compiler comes with the distribution.
Stephen Dennis
> From: Ulrich Weigand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday,
Stephen Dennis wrote:
>gcc version 2.95.2
>
>And, before you ask me to try gcc 3.0.x, yes; I could boot-strap a later
>compiler. I'm using ihost.com servers.com.
>
>Compiler Options: gcc -O -g
Hmm, I cannot reproduce the error with my latest gcc 2.95.2 tree
(nor with 2.95.3 or 3.1 ...).
Where i
Small program that reproduces the problem follows:
#include
void irrelevant(void)
{
static volatile int x;
x++;
}
double AddWithError(double& err, double a, double b)
{
double sum = a+b;
err = b-(sum-a);
//irrelevant();
return sum;
}
double AddDoubles(double pd[])
{
I'll work a minimal program and on whether the irrelevant() call -must-
be at the following specific line and only at the following specific
line, but I did isolate it a little further:
static void irrelevant(void)
{
static volatile int x;
x++;
}
static double AddWithError(double& err, d
Ulrich Weigand
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: your mail
>
> Stephen Dennis wrote:
>
> >I tested MUX 2.1 on a concrete machine and found the same behavior,
so
> >the Hercules emulator is vindicated. It looks like a
Stephen Dennis wrote:
>I tested MUX 2.1 on a concrete machine and found the same behavior, so
>the Hercules emulator is vindicated. It looks like a compiler bug.
It does :-( What compiler version are you using?
Exactly what options are used to compile that file?
How does the behaviour change
I tested MUX 2.1 on a concrete machine and found the same behavior, so
the Hercules emulator is vindicated. It looks like a compiler bug.
Without the calls to irrelevant(), AddDoubles(2, {1.6, .1}) returns 0.2.
With the calls to irrelevant, it returns 1.7.
static void irrelevant(void)
{
stat
> Pentium Pro 200, the emulator achieves about 1.5-2.5 MIPS (Pentium II
> 400 achieves about 10 MIPS). Once Linux/390 was up with access to the
> Internet, I compiled MUX 2.1 on it -- something which took about 12
> hours.
Ouch 8)
> and then either the compiler or one of the emulation layers is
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 04:24:51PM -0500, Bruce Hayden wrote:
> I'd guess from the STSI instruction - it says it returns up to 8 levels.
I wonder whether this is not released yet. The experimental code for 2.4.17
only displays up to the 3rd level, although the code does indeed use the STSI
instr
30 matches
Mail list logo
