; William Hannum;
Joshua Kime; Eugene Prizhitomsky; Larry Sybrandt; Mark Akerman; Jerry Steppke
Cc: Thomas Greco; Balbir Singh
Subject: FW: z/VM, Linux, MQ, "HA"?
Albert (and others),
As another follow-up to yesterday's z/Linux discussion on MQ "HA" alternatives,
I'
Marcy Cortes wrote:
Right - to have more than one system access it - only one side can be
r/w to it (unless you have some sort of clustering file system). That's
why I suggested CSE to keep it safe - VM can protect the links.
No, precisely _none_ can have rw access. Linux_1 caches, Linux_[^1]
Tom Burkholder wrote:
Hello,
This is my initial post to this z/VM listserv, so please let me know if this should/could
be addressed somewhere else. Here's the scoop.. we're doing the POC (proof-of-concept)
with z/VM 5.3 and have successfully created a handful of z/Linux SuSE server, and from
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU> Subject
Re: z/VM, Linux, MQ, "HA"?
ation."
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Fargusson.Alan
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 10:15 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] z/VM, Linux, MQ, "HA"?
Even if only one system has the filesystem mounted r
PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Marcy Cortes
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 8:59 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM, Linux, MQ, "HA"?
Right - to have more than one system access it - only one side can be
r/w to it (unless you have some sort of clustering file system). That's
why I s
age. Thank you for your cooperation."
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Fargusson.Alan
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 8:45 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] z/VM, Linux, MQ, "HA"?
Even with minidisk cac
Subject: Re: z/VM, Linux, MQ, "HA"?
There's this http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-halinux2/
which discusses MQ. We've got a project that wants to try this.
Nothing special for z/Linux except that the DASD would be accessible by
more than one LPAR and we need
lf Of
Tom Burkholder
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 5:59 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] z/VM, Linux, MQ, "HA"?
Alan and Marty,
Thanks... yes, I had previously read this HA architectures for Linux on
System z (which is a very good reference) and because we are a
MQ on z/Linux, similar to the whitepaper doc below?
Thanks in advance,
Tom Burkholder
From: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcy Cortes [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 7:31 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re:
rom: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Alan Altmark
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 4:14 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] z/VM, Linux, MQ, "HA"?
On Wednesday, 08/13/2008 at 05:12 EDT, Tom Burkholder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I c
On Wednesday, 08/13/2008 at 05:12 EDT, Tom Burkholder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I contend that the z/10 h/w is reliable, the DASD
> is raid, the vswitch can have failover OSA's, so as long as we alert and
don't
> fill up filesystems, we have a decent chance to keep the QMGR available
on the
>
Hello,
This is my initial post to this z/VM listserv, so please let me know if this
should/could be addressed somewhere else. Here's the scoop.. we're doing the
POC (proof-of-concept) with z/VM 5.3 and have successfully created a handful of
z/Linux SuSE server, and from watching this list serv
13 matches
Mail list logo
