Re: Dos Binary Compatibility WAS Re: elksfs status

2000-02-05 Thread David Murn
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, Greg Haerr wrote: > Yes. I'm quite familiar with MSDOS EXE format and the current > code doesn't do anything near what's required. And even if it did, > there's the problem of having linking with a Linux8086 libc but producing > .exe files... I know. I guess someone obviou

Re: Dos Binary Compatibility WAS Re: elksfs status

2000-02-05 Thread Greg Haerr
: Basically, its simply a binary format handler, which simply processes the : exe header from a file, and claims that its valid or not. It was more an : excercise for me learning how to parse exe headers. Yes. I'm quite familiar with MSDOS EXE format and the current code doesn't do anything nea

Re: Dos Binary Compatibility WAS Re: elksfs status

2000-02-05 Thread David Murn
On 4 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd be interested in any information/documentation on the MSDOS binary > compatibility in ELKS. Oh god, is that still there? I put it in as a joke 2 years ago :) > What purpose does it serve in the project? For the project, it had no real purpose. >

Re: Dos Binary Compatibility WAS Re: elksfs status

2000-02-04 Thread semjaza
I'd be interested in any information/documentation on the MSDOS binary compatibility in ELKS. What purpose does it serve in the project? How is it being accomplished? What could it be used for? How compatible and with what versions of DOS? What is its current status and where is it going?