Re: ELKS 0.0.81 slower than the 0.0.76

2000-07-18 Thread COIFFIER =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric
Greg Haerr a écrit: > the older versions are faster > : > than the newer. The starting is the same but the shell is slower. > : Mods to tty stuff shouldn't give any sort of noticeable difference, or fs > : stuff. There is mention of changes to timer code, but I don't see why any > : stuff like th

Re: ELKS 0.0.81 slower than the 0.0.76

2000-07-15 Thread Luke Farrar
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Greg Haerr wrote: > the older versions are faster > : > than the newer. The starting is the same but the shell is slower. > : Mods to tty stuff shouldn't give any sort of noticeable difference, or fs > : stuff. There is mention of changes to timer code, but I don't see why

Re: ELKS 0.0.81 slower than the 0.0.76

2000-07-13 Thread Greg Haerr
the older versions are faster : > than the newer. The starting is the same but the shell is slower. : Mods to tty stuff shouldn't give any sort of noticeable difference, or fs : stuff. There is mention of changes to timer code, but I don't see why any : stuff like that should make any noticable di

Re: ELKS 0.0.81 slower than the 0.0.76

2000-07-13 Thread Luke Farrar
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, COIFFIER =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric ?= wrote: > I've installed EKLS on an old 386 with 2Mbytes RAM. I've tried > several versions and I've remarked that the older versions are faster > than the newer. The starting is the same but the shell is slower. > The change i

ELKS 0.0.81 slower than the 0.0.76

2000-07-12 Thread COIFFIER =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric
I've installed EKLS on an old 386 with 2Mbytes RAM. I've tried several versions and I've remarked that the older versions are faster than the newer. The starting is the same but the shell is slower. The change is appeared between the 0.0.76 version and the next one. Why ?