On 4 Oct 1999, Vidar Hokstad wrote:
I still personally think the MPL is the only standard license that fits
the linked in case at all
I agree, but on the other hand I'd gladly support licensing the code under
both the GPL and the MPL, so that those who wants to develop free software
can
As long as the API and/or messaging protocol are open spec, then anyone
can write their own library. X is an example, XFree uses opensource
license, metrox and accelx used closed. Same function, same result, but
they had to write their own library.
[Equally a server]
Actually they
I totally agree with Alan...
--
"It's not about the money...It's about the rules. Without rules,
we might as well be tree climbers flinging crap at each other."
- Red Foreman of That '70s Show
On Mon,
On Monday, October 04, 1999 4:51 PM, Vidar Hokstad [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
: the near future I and another developer will be working
: nearly full time on it, and we also sponsor another company to port a major
: software product to NanoGUI.
:
: This is code that we contribute back.
On Mon, 4 Oct 1999 18:28:03 -0600 you wrote:
On Monday, October 04, 1999 4:51 PM, Vidar Hokstad [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
: the near future I and another developer will be working
: nearly full time on it, and we also sponsor another company to port a major
: software product to
