On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 21:59 +0800, Yu, Luming wrote:
> >Hi everybody,
> >I have a new laptop one HP Compaq NX6110 , that works quite well with
> >suspend and hibernation.
> >
> >But after suspend , how I bring back computer ?, the only key that I
> >know is power button, but after press power butto
HI!
> > I have created a place under sysfs to have a unified place
> > to gather user input for common hotkey features.
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5749#c10
> >
> > All of you are owner of a specific acpi hotkey driver.
> > Would you like to use that sysfs support to reduce t
Hi!
> I have created a place under sysfs to have a unified place
> to gather user input for common hotkey features.
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5749#c10
>
> All of you are owner of a specific acpi hotkey driver.
> Would you like to use that sysfs support to reduce the
> unneces
Adding Guy to the list
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-acpi-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bjorn Helgaas
> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 11:22 AM
> To: Moore, Robert
> Cc: Kenji Kaneshige; Brown, Len; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Andrew
> Morton; Keshavamurth
On Friday 21 April 2006 11:23, Moore, Robert wrote:
> Response from Guy Therien:
>
> When the module device is ignored the devices under it will not be
> enumerated and so those devices need to be declared elsewhere where they
> will be enumerated in the event that the OS does not support module
>
Response from Guy Therien:
When the module device is ignored the devices under it will not be
enumerated and so those devices need to be declared elsewhere where they
will be enumerated in the event that the OS does not support module
device.
Consider processors on hot plug modules that are not
On Friday 21 April 2006 18:53, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Friday 21 April 2006 17:18, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Friday 21 April 2006 04:43, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > > If booting with acpi=off and loading the processor module, it
> > > may happen that the kernel oopses when trying to unload t
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 06:53:46PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Friday 21 April 2006 17:18, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Friday 21 April 2006 04:43, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > > If booting with acpi=off and loading the processor module, it
> > > may happen that the kernel oopses when trying
On Friday 21 April 2006 17:18, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Friday 21 April 2006 04:43, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > If booting with acpi=off and loading the processor module, it
> > may happen that the kernel oopses when trying to unload the module again.
> > Better exit all ACPI modules immediately i
On Friday 21 April 2006 04:43, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> If booting with acpi=off and loading the processor module, it
> may happen that the kernel oopses when trying to unload the module again.
> Better exit all ACPI modules immediately if booted with acpi=off.
> ...
> @@ -289,31 +289,28 @@ stati
1. ACPI names are 4 bytes long, so AC will be padded with _.
2. Your output shows that there is no handler for AC event, do you have ACPI AC
driver compiled and loaded?
Andriy Stepanov wrote:
Hello!
I have a notebook.
System doesn't change energy consumption policy when I unplug ACAD.
# ser
On 4/21/06, Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > Le jeudi 20 avril 2006 à 15:30 -0400, Dmitry Torokhov a écrit :
> >> On 4/20/06, Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Xavier Bestel wrote:
> There are keyboards with power/sleep buttons. It ma
On 4/21/06, Yu, Luming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > There are keyboards with power/sleep buttons. It makes
> >sense they have
> >> > the same behavior than ACPI buttons.
> >> Agree, make them behave like ACPI buttons -- remove them
> >from input stream, as they do not belong there...
> >
> >Wh
Hello!
I have a notebook.
System doesn't change energy consumption policy when I unplug ACAD.
# service acpid stop
# cat /proc/acpi/event
processor CPU0 0080 0001 <- unplug ACAD
processor CPU0 0080
No any messages about ACAD.
My dsdt.dsl have two following interesti
Hello!
> If you define input layer as a universe place to all manual input
> activity, then I agree to port some type of ACPI event into
> input layer. But it shouldn't be a fake keyboard scancode,
> My suggestion is to have a separate input event type,e.g. EV_ACPI
> for acpi event layer.
But w
I could not resist to also remove the ACPI function trace
from init/exit functions... This has been done already recently IIRC,
please tell me if it's in your test tree or whether I should just do the
changes on top of the function trace removal patch.
Subject: Exit ACPI modules if acpi is disable
Berthold Cogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Johan Vromans wrote:
>> https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=129330
>
> Thanks! I've overlooked the patches at Sourceforge.
> Is there any chance to get the patch into the kernel somehow?
There are two patches required. One patch is t
Xavier Bestel wrote:
Le jeudi 20 avril 2006 à 15:30 -0400, Dmitry Torokhov a écrit :
On 4/20/06, Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Xavier Bestel wrote:
There are keyboards with power/sleep buttons. It makes sense they have
the same behavior than ACPI buttons.
Agree, make them beh
>> > There are keyboards with power/sleep buttons. It makes
>sense they have
>> > the same behavior than ACPI buttons.
>> Agree, make them behave like ACPI buttons -- remove them
>from input stream, as they do not belong there...
>
>What if there is no ACPI? What if I want to remap the button to
19 matches
Mail list logo