On Wednesday, 6 September 2006 23:12, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Wed 2006-09-06 22:47:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, 6 September 2006 12:42, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Now, the output of /proc/interrupts with everything loaded is
CPU0 CPU1
On Thursday, 7 September 2006 09:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 September 2006 23:12, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Wed 2006-09-06 22:47:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, 6 September 2006 12:42, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Now, the output of
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 20:03, Shaohua Li wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 04:04 +0800, keith mannthey wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 11:59 -0700, Moore, Robert wrote:
From one of the ACPI guys:
Get hid
Look for driver
If you find a match, load it
If no match, get
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 20:08 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:55:11 +0200
Maciej Rutecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bjorn Helgaas napisał(a):
This ACPI unknown exception code problem is the same one reported here:
Hi!
(Just for the record, suspend with snd_hda_intel seems to work
here...)
The problem seems to be related to the MSI. Andrew and Greg KH say the
MSI code have been rewritten recently, so there's some hope.
I've just learnt that it's possible to disable the MSI in snd_hda_intel
Hi,
On Friday, 8 September 2006 00:08, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
(Just for the record, suspend with snd_hda_intel seems to work
here...)
The problem seems to be related to the MSI. Andrew and Greg KH say the
MSI code have been rewritten recently, so there's some hope.
Hi Kristen.
Great to see this!
Allow me to anticipate a question I'm sure will come: will this play
well with (say) suspending while docked and resuming undocked?
Regards,
Nigel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:25 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
If we decide that try HID first, then try CID is the right thing,
I think we should figure out how to make that work. Maybe that
means extending the driver model somehow.
Don't think it's easy, especially no other bus needs it I guess.
When determining if a device is on a dock station, we should
check the parent of the device as well.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: 2.6-git/drivers/acpi/dock.c
===
---
Hello,
Ever since I put out the docking station patches people have been asking me
if I could get removable drive bays to work as well. These are devices such
as the IBM/Lenovo Ultrabay, or the Dell Module Bay - basically removable disk
drives. There is an IBM platform specific solution that
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:25 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 20:03, Shaohua Li wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 04:04 +0800, keith mannthey wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 11:59 -0700, Moore, Robert wrote:
From one of the ACPI guys:
Get hid
Look for
11 matches
Mail list logo
