Re: [PATCH] do not compile Sony Vaio extras as a module per default

2006-10-22 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:54:30 +0200 (MEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > >--- current/drivers/acpi/Kconfig.orig2006-10-21 10:02:23.0 > >+0200 > >+++ current/drivers/acpi/Kconfig 2006-10-21 10:02:30.0 +0200 > >@@ -262,7 +262,6 @@ config ACPI_SONY > > tristate "Sony Lapt

Re: [patch 0/2] acpi: driverregistration again can report ENODEV

2006-10-22 Thread Thomas Renninger
On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 10:55 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Friday 20 October 2006 03:59, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 11:25 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Currently acpi_bus_register_driver only reports an error > > > (-ENODEV) if acpi_disabled is true, > > > but many

2.6.19-rc2: known unfixed regressions (v3)

2006-10-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
This email lists some known unfixed regressions in 2.6.19-rc2 compared to 2.6.18 that are not yet fixed Linus' tree. If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch of you caused a breakage or I'm consi

Re: [PATCH] do not compile Sony Vaio extras as a module per default

2006-10-22 Thread Jan Engelhardt
>--- current/drivers/acpi/Kconfig.orig 2006-10-21 10:02:23.0 +0200 >+++ current/drivers/acpi/Kconfig 2006-10-21 10:02:30.0 +0200 >@@ -262,7 +262,6 @@ config ACPI_SONY > tristate "Sony Laptop Extras" > depends on X86 && ACPI > select BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE >