RE: ia64 acpi-cpufreq driver

>-Original Message- >From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 2:31 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org >Subject: ia64 acpi-cpufreq driver > >arch/ia64/kernel/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c currently makes d

[PATCH] acpi: make ec_transaction not extern

From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix sparse warning: drivers/acpi/ec.c:372:12: warning: function 'ec_transaction' with external linkage has definition Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/acpi/ec.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- linux

Re: [linux-pm] Building ACPI for PPC architecture

rajeshprabhu72721 writes: > We are trying to build ACPI for PPC e300 core . The problem is we Why? What problem do you think that will solve? > donot have a BIOS running to supply the System Descriptor Tables to > ACPI during boot. So ACPI gets disabled during boot. Are the system > desc tables

ia64 acpi-cpufreq driver

arch/ia64/kernel/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c currently makes direct calls to PAL_SET_PSTATE. Section 8.4.4.1 (_PCT) of the 3.0 ACPI spec says: OSPM performs processor performance transitions by writing the performance state-specific control value to a Performance Control Register (PERF_CTRL). A

Re: [PATCH] do not compile Sony Vaio extras as a module per default

On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 09:10:54AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:54:30 +0200 (MEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > > > >--- current/drivers/acpi/Kconfig.orig 2006-10-21 10:02:23.0 > > >+0200 > > >+++ current/drivers/acpi/Kconfig 2006-10-21 10:02:30.0 +02

Re: [PATCH] do not compile Sony Vaio extras as a module per default

On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 09:10:54AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:54:30 +0200 (MEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > > > >--- current/drivers/acpi/Kconfig.orig 2006-10-21 10:02:23.0 > > >+0200 > > >+++ current/drivers/acpi/Kconfig 2006-10-21 10:02:30.0 +02

Re: [patch 0/2] acpi: driverregistration again can report ENODEV

Hi, first i want to thank you for your feedback, which i really appreciate very much. On Monday 23 October 2006 17:34, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > I think the current tree contains a merge error in asus_acpi_init(). > It says: > > if (!asus_hotk_found) { > ... > retu

Re: Building ACPI for PPC architecture

On Monday 23 October 2006 04:36, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > You should try to build ACPI CA interpreter in user-space for your > architecture first. > Get it here: http://www.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads.htm > There is a big chance that you will find too many endian issues. That is

Re: [patch 0/2] acpi: driverregistration again can report ENODEV

On Sunday 22 October 2006 09:09, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 10:55 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Here's my patch that results in the current behavior: > > > > http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=9d9f749b316ac21cb59ad3e595cbce469b4

2.6.18 - A6T model detected, unsupported..DSDT

Hi acpi-userlist, i'm running FC5 on an Asus A6T-AP005H (dual Turion 64bit) laptop. For a month now i'm trying to solve a problem with the kernel, which at the end led me to the assumption it could be something with the acpi. For dmesg and other mobo info see the bug i posted on the fedora list:

Re: Building ACPI for PPC architecture

You should try to build ACPI CA interpreter in user-space for your architecture first. Get it here: http://www.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads.htm There is a big chance that you will find too many endian issues. Regards, Alex. rajeshprabhu72721 wrote: > > We are trying to build

Building ACPI for PPC architecture

We are trying to build ACPI for PPC e300 core . The problem is we donot have a BIOS running to supply the System Descriptor Tables to ACPI during boot. So ACPI gets disabled during boot. Are the system desc tables must for the ACPI to run? Or is there a method where we can avoid these tables a