[GIT PATCH] fix ACPI interrupt regression in 2.6.19

2006-12-01 Thread Len Brown
Hi Linus, Greg/Chris, please pull from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release This is a single revert on top of 2.6.19. If fixes a regression which was introduced after 2.6.18 and before 2.6.19. thanks! -Len ps. a plain patch is also available here: ftp

Re: Error calling BSTS

2006-12-01 Thread Corentin CHARY
Le samedi 2 décembre 2006 00:46, Stephen Clark a écrit : > Asus Laptop ACPI Extras version 0.30 > Error calling BSTS > unsupported model Z96F, trying default values > send /proc/acpi/dsdt to the developers Please send /proc/acpi/dsdt, not dmidecode output :) cat /proc/acpi/dsdt > /tmp/dsdt

Error calling BSTS

2006-12-01 Thread Stephen Clark
Asus Laptop ACPI Extras version 0.30 Error calling BSTS unsupported model Z96F, trying default values send /proc/acpi/dsdt to the developers -- "They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin) "The course of history show

Re: [PATCH] acpi: add backlight support to the sony_acpi driver (v2)

2006-12-01 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006, Pavel Machek wrote: > Looks okay to me. We really want unified interface for backlight. Then I request some help to get http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/19792 merged. Without it, the backlight interface becomes annoying on laptops. Your screen will be powered

acpi misreports battery

2006-12-01 Thread Hans Halvorson
The following is the content of my /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/state present: yes capacity state: ok charging state: charged present rate:1 mA remaining capacity: 4800 mAh present voltage: 12465 mV The following is the content of my /proc/acp

Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] ACPI vs device ordering on resume

2006-12-01 Thread Alexey Starikovskiy
Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 20:45:51 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Linus Torvalds wrote: On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Pavel Machek wrote: So it looks like we need this sequence: enable_nonboot_cpus() /* INIT */ finish()/* _WAK */ devi

Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] ACPI vs device ordering on resume

2006-12-01 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 20:45:51 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > So it looks like we need this sequence: > > enable_nonboot_cpus() /* INIT */ > finish() /* _WAK */ > device_re

Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] ACPI vs device ordering on resume

2006-12-01 Thread Alexey Starikovskiy
Linus Torvalds wrote: On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Pavel Machek wrote: So it looks like we need this sequence: enable_nonboot_cpus() /* INIT */ finish()/* _WAK */ device_resume() Can somebody remind me about this immediately after 2.6.19? Remind. But note that freezer is no

Re: [PATCH] acpi: add backlight support to the sony_acpi driver (v2)

2006-12-01 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Enable the sony_acpi driver to use the backlight subsysyem for > adjusting the monitor brightness. Old way of changing the brightness will be > still available for compatibility with existing tools. > > Signed-off-by: Alessandro Guido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Looks okay to me. We really want un

Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] ACPI vs device ordering on resume

2006-12-01 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > So it looks like we need this sequence: > > > > > > enable_nonboot_cpus() /* INIT */ > > > finish() /* _WAK */ > > > device_resume() > > > > Can somebody remind me about this immediately after 2.6.19? > > Remind. But note that freezer is not yet

Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] ACPI vs device ordering on resume

2006-12-01 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Friday, 1 December 2006 11:57, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > > So it looks like we need this sequence: > > > > > > > > > > enable_nonboot_cpus() /* INIT */ > > > > > finish() /* _WAK */ > > > > > device_resume() > > > > > > > > Can somebody remind me about this immediately aft

Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] ACPI vs device ordering on resume

2006-12-01 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > > So it looks like we need this sequence: > > > > > > > > enable_nonboot_cpus() /* INIT */ > > > > finish()/* _WAK */ > > > > device_resume() > > > > > > Can somebody remind me about this immediately after 2.6.19? > > > > Remind. But note that freezer is not yet SMP safe... Ra

Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] ACPI vs device ordering on resume

2006-12-01 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Friday, 1 December 2006 10:33, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > So it looks like we need this sequence: > > > > > > enable_nonboot_cpus() /* INIT */ > > > finish() /* _WAK */ > > > device_resume() > > > > Can somebody remind me about this immediately after 2.6.19? > > Remind. But note

Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] ACPI vs device ordering on resume

2006-12-01 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, 1 December 2006 02:48, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 02:03:30 -0500 > Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 14 November 2006 18:30, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > If I do a suspend-to-ram then resume on a Sony Vaio laptop with sky2 > > > driver, > > > t

Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] ACPI vs device ordering on resume

2006-12-01 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > So it looks like we need this sequence: > > > > enable_nonboot_cpus() /* INIT */ > > finish()/* _WAK */ > > device_resume() > > Can somebody remind me about this immediately after 2.6.19? Remind. But note that freezer is not yet SMP safe... Rafael is working on that.

updated patches of sysfs branch

2006-12-01 Thread Zhang Rui
> The following patches are on the "sysfs" branch of the ACPI git tree. > > To test, apply this e-mail series, or git pull from here: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git sysfs > > I am hopeful that this series will settle down and make the test branch > shor