> Len, can you show me the ACPIDUMP and dmesg of 2.6.20-rc1 with this debug
> patch please?
lets work this here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7695
thanks,
-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mor
Remove the procfs related code from the bay driver.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/acpi/bay.c | 152 -
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 150 deletions(-)
--- kristen-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/bay.c
+++ kriste
Convert the bay driver to be a platform driver, so that we can have sysfs
entries.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/acpi/bay.c | 87 +
1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- kristen-2.6.o
Hi Len,
Here's a set of patches for changing the removable drive bay driver
(drivers/acpi/bay) from using the old proc interface to using a sysfs
interface instead. I made the bay driver a platform driver, and
so it's entries will now be located in /sys/devices/platform/bay.X.
There are still 2 e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 07 December 2006 23:40, Lebedev, Vladimir P wrote:
> Please register new bug, attach acpidump and dmesg.
>
Rafael, do you have bug number (so that I can add my system to it) or should I
open new bug report?
>
> -Original Message-
Yes. We do made several changes on .bind/.unbind method.
It seems that DEVICE(BPD0) doesn't have the _PRT method, which is required when
binding BPD0.PXH0 and BPD0.PXH1. This is really strange...
Len, can you show me the ACPIDUMP and dmesg of 2.6.20-rc1 with this debug patch
please?
Thanks,
Zha
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 02:59:53AM -0500, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
> Pavel Troller wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >Try the following:
> > cat /proc/acpi/processor/*/power in the following situations:
> > 1) After loading the processor module being on the battery,
> > 2) After loading the processor modu
Pavel Troller wrote:
Hi!
Try the following:
cat /proc/acpi/processor/*/power in the following situations:
1) After loading the processor module being on the battery,
2) After loading the processor module being on AC,
3) After disconnecting the AC,
and compare the results. I think that
