On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [changed Cc list]
>
> On Sunday, 25 February 2007 18:14, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 25 February 2007 11:37, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > > > On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007,
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 02:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Subject: LCD is dimmed (ibm-acpi related)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/25/206
> > Submitter : Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Caused-By : Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 16:50, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On 3/7/07, Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So, I tracked this down to 2.6.21-git7, the first snapshot that gives me
> > this problem. Tellingly it does contain an input tree merge. I would git
> > bisect
> > but I don't have
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Ash Milsted wrote:
>
> Anyway, here's the bootlog for Dmitry from a boot with broken keyboard
> (2.6.21-rc3):
The non-working setup doesn't get any interrupts back, and thus doesn't
see the ACK for the "\xd4\xed" command.
It really looks interrupt-related (especially cons
Le mardi 06 mars 2007 à 16:15 -0800, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:36:29 -0800
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8136
> So rc2-mm2 panics due to "MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC"
> and
> rc2-mm1 does not.
>
> Could be
On 3/7/07, Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:00:04 +
Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 14:23:50 +
> Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:14:24 +
> > Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Ash Milsted wrote:
>
> So, I tracked this down to 2.6.21-git7, the first snapshot that gives me
> this problem.
Hmm. There is no "2.6.21-git7" (that would be the seventh nightly snapshot
after 2.6.21 is released, which hasn't happened yet!).
Do you mean that it happens bet
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007, Len Brown wrote:
> Anybody got any candidates for a series of transactions that would
> benefit from this mode? If yes, is it possible to detect an efficiency
> benefit from enabling burst mode for that series?
ibm-acpi would like a lot to have burst-mode for EC dumps (read o
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:00:04 +
Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 14:23:50 +
> Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:14:24 +
> > Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > With 2.6.21-rc2-git1 I have a problem with
Hi,
Anything after 2.6.20-pv (plain vanilla) hangs during boot
for me. I built a kernel with CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y and booted
with acpi_dbg_level=0x10 acpi_dbg_layer=01x1ff.
Boot log for 2.6.20-git1 is here:
http://www.xenotime.net/linux/logs/2620-g1-bootlog.txt
Ideas, suggestions?
Thanks,
---
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:40:19 +0100 (CET), Bodo Eggert wrote:
> > 1) I asume port allocations or ACPI foreign port acces to be rare, so
> >there would be little impact on (un)registering hardware. Off cause
> >there are some long ACPI calls (like rea
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Subject: AT keyboard only works with pci=noacpi
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/3/68
> > Submitter : Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Status : unknown
>
> sounds like a BIOS bug, even though it appears to
On 3/7/07, Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 14:23:50 +
Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:14:24 +
> Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > With 2.6.21-rc2-git1 I have a problem with my ps/2 port keyboard - it only
works
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 14:23:50 +
Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:14:24 +
> Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > With 2.6.21-rc2-git1 I have a problem with my ps/2 port keyboard - it only
> > works
> > with one of the following on the command-li
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178
Submitter : Mathieu Bérard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status : unknown
according to the last message in that thread, it sounds like ACPI and
interrupt problems
Subject:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: AT keyboard only works with pci=noacpi
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/3/68
Submitter : Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status : unknown
sounds like a BIOS bug, even though it appears to be a regression?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the l
Hi!
> > > > 2) make ACPI take this lock whenever it touches ports not allocated by
> > > > itself
> > > >and release it on function return.
> > >
> > > This is costly.
> >
> > TANSTAAFL. You'll need to take some lock, and if you want port emulation
> > or per-device-mutex, you'll have to p
Hi Bodo,
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:40:19 +0100 (CET), Bodo Eggert wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:56:44 +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote:
>
> > > 2) make ACPI take this lock whenever it touches ports not allocated by
> > > itself
> > >and release it on functio
Applied
thanks,
-Len
Subject: ACPI: ThinkPad Z60m: usb mouse stops working after suspend to RAM
From: Konstantin Karasyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org/msg05270.html):
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/21/413
http://lkml.org/lkml
okay, sure.
applied.
thanks,
-Len
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 05:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Bernhard Walle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Add hint that acpi=off doesn't work on IA64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
Applied.
thanks,
-Len
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 05:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch makes the following needlessly global code static:
> - driver.c: __cpuidle_find_driver()
> - governor.c: __cpuidle_find_governor()
> - ladder.c: struct ladder_gov
Applied.
thanks,
-Len
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 05:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> drivers/misc/sony-laptop.c: In function 'sony_acpi_add':
> drivers/misc/sony-laptop.c:456: warning: 'result' may be used uninitialized
> in this function
>
> The compile
Len Brown wrote:
why is fake_ecdt no longer necessary -- because ec initializes first now?
right
while I'm glad to see the ec_burst_enable exported -- it is currently
not called and we continue to always operate in normal mode, yes?
yes
it seems that burst mode is intended for when we
On Friday 09 February 2007 03:34, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 00:47 -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> > Why not simply check acpi_disabled, like other drivers do?
> >
> See comment from Dominik when I sent something similar some time ago:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-acpi&m=
Applied.
thanks,
-Len
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 05:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Fix the compile issues when CPU_IDLE is not configured.
>
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Adam Belay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Shaohu
25 matches
Mail list logo
