RE: [repost] acpi on gentoo

2007-03-12 Thread Nigel
> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:57:58 +0300 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [repost] acpi on gentoo > > Nigel wrote: > > response inline > > > > Luming Yu said on 11/3/2007 3:12 PM: > >> On 3/11/07, Nigel <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [repost] acpi on gentoo

2007-03-12 Thread Alexey Starikovskiy
Nigel wrote: > Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:57:58 +0300 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [repost] acpi on gentoo > > Nigel wrote: > > response inline > > > > Luming Yu said on 11/3/2007 3:12 PM: > >> On 3/11/07, Nig

RE: [repost] acpi on gentoo

2007-03-12 Thread Nigel Nigel
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:16:51 +0300 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [repost] acpi on gentoo > > Nigel wrote: > > > > > Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:57:58 +0300 > > > From: [EMAIL PROT

Re: [repost] acpi on gentoo

2007-03-12 Thread Alexey Starikovskiy
Nigel Nigel wrote: Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:16:51 +0300 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [repost] acpi on gentoo Nigel wrote: Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:57:58 +0300 From: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [repost] acpi on gentoo

2007-03-12 Thread Nigel
Alexey Starikovskiy said on 12/03/2007 2:46 PM: Nigel Nigel wrote: Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:16:51 +0300 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [repost] acpi on gentoo Nigel wrote: Date: S

[PATCH] sony-laptop: MAINTAINERS fix entry, add L: and W:

2007-03-12 Thread Mattia Dongili
Probably the wrong MAINTAINERS patch has been picked up (sorry for not checking earlier), the following fix that and adds WWW and list contacts for the Sony drivers. Signed-off-by: Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Sorry for the inconvenience Len. diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS inde

Re: Odd suspend regression in 2.6.21-rc[123]

2007-03-12 Thread Len Brown
On Saturday 10 March 2007 01:18, Ray Lee wrote: > Ray Lee wrote: > > In 2.6.21-rc1,2,3, my laptop will fully suspend to ram, but then > > *immediately* resumes back from suspension. (It resumes just fine, as well.) > [...] > > HP/Compaq NX6125 system, AMD64, dmesg attached. > > hg bisect found the

Re: ACPI: resolve GPE immediate wakeup regression

2007-03-12 Thread Len Brown
On Monday 12 March 2007 12:59, Ray Lee wrote: > Len Brown wrote: > > On Saturday 10 March 2007 01:18, Ray Lee wrote: > >> Ray Lee wrote: > >>> In 2.6.21-rc1,2,3, my laptop will fully suspend to ram, but then > >>> *immediately* resumes back from suspension. (It resumes just fine, as > >>> well.) >

ACPI: resolve GPE immediate wakeup regression

2007-03-12 Thread Ray Lee
Len Brown wrote: > On Saturday 10 March 2007 01:18, Ray Lee wrote: >> Ray Lee wrote: >>> In 2.6.21-rc1,2,3, my laptop will fully suspend to ram, but then >>> *immediately* resumes back from suspension. (It resumes just fine, as well.) >> [...] >>> HP/Compaq NX6125 system, AMD64, dmesg attached. >

Re: [PATCH] ACPI disabled due to DMI failure or blacklisted year should be noted, as is done with other ACPI blacklisting

2007-03-12 Thread Anthony Godshall, Ampro Computers, Inc.
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 17:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patch titled ACPI disabled due to DMI failure or blacklisted year should be noted, as is done with other ACPI blacklisting has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is acpi-disabled-due-to-dmi-failure-or-blacklisted-y

regarding ACPI support in 2.6.21

2007-03-12 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, all. Currently, libata-acpi has the following problems. 1. Matching controller/device to ACPI node. It currently uses ap->cbl == ATA_CBL_SATA test to choose between two formats - the traditional ATA nodes with master/slave devices and new native SATA nodes. This is incorrect as ata_piix

Re: regarding ACPI support in 2.6.21

2007-03-12 Thread Alan Cox
> I think it might be better to give up ACPI support in 2.6.21 and target > 2.6.22. What do you think? I removed it from my tree already so that I can actually use libata and do real work. The "crash every non PCI controller" feature in the current ACPI hacks means PCMCIA and ISAPnP do not work a

Re: regarding ACPI support in 2.6.21

2007-03-12 Thread Jeff Garzik
Alan Cox wrote: I think it might be better to give up ACPI support in 2.6.21 and target 2.6.22. What do you think? I removed it from my tree already so that I can actually use libata and do real work. The "crash every non PCI controller" feature in the current ACPI hacks means PCMCIA and ISAPn

Re: regarding ACPI support in 2.6.21

2007-03-12 Thread Alan Cox
> It sounds like your tree is out-of-date. Your patch to fix that went in > days ago, applied by Linus directly: Its purposefully not tracking every Linus update so I can build a replicable environment. I missed the list mail it went in tho. > I lean towards disabling it by default in 2.6.21 an

[patch] ACPI video driver output switch sysfs support

2007-03-12 Thread Luming Yu
Add output switch sysfs class support for ACPI video driver. signed-off-by: Luming Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/acpi/Kconfig |2 +- drivers/acpi/video.c | 38 ++ drivers/video/Kconfig|7 +++ drivers/video/Makefile |3 +++ inclu

Re: [patch] ACPI video driver output switch sysfs support

2007-03-12 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Luming Yu wrote: > Add output switch sysfs class support for ACPI video driver. > > drivers/acpi/Kconfig |2 +- > drivers/acpi/video.c | 38 ++ > drivers/video/Kconfig|7 +++ > drivers/video/Makefile |3 +++ >

Re: [PATCH] sony-laptop: MAINTAINERS fix entry, add L: and W:

2007-03-12 Thread Len Brown
applied. thanks, -Len On Monday 12 March 2007 16:43, Mattia Dongili wrote: > Probably the wrong MAINTAINERS patch has been picked up (sorry for not > checking earlier), the following fix that and adds WWW and list contacts > for the Sony drivers. > > Signed-off-by: Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-12 Thread Tejun Heo
Mathieu Bérard wrote: > Jeff Garzik a écrit : >> Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive >>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178 >>> Submitter : Mathieu Bérard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Status : unknown >> according to the last message in that threa