Hi, all
I tried to set the register to trigger a SCI. But the system crashed
with output:
[ACPI]Error (evgpe-0711): No hander or method for GPE [2],disabling ..
Did I set wrong register?
The system's ioports map is different from ACPI register map defined
in Intel ICH8 manual. My kernel vers
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 03:58 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 05 April 2007 12:59 am, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 08:41 +0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > > In that example, two devices don't actually exist (USB3, S139), one can't
> > > issue wakeup events (PCI0), and two see
This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt| 23 -
arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig | 18
arc
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
lets kill this in 2.6.22
Dave
--
http://www
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> lets
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:38:25AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk
On Friday 06 April 2007 2:36 am, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 03:58 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> >
> > For wakeup devices, the main issue I've seen is with button devices.
> > In my limited set of test sytems, everything else is either PCI, PNP,
> > or a bug (listing a non-existent
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:36:47 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
> the following patch series is the state of the art of my work toward
> reimplementing sonypi into sony-laptop. Most patches are mostly cosmetic
> to try to obtain a decent namespace separation between the used
> subsystems and
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 08:43:30AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > > If this patch starts to get deployed, I expect other people will find
> > > a few other curiousities ... and likely some things to be fixed.
> >
> > > The /sys/devices/acpi_system:00/ tree is kind of new. I suspect one
> > > wa
