Re: Fwd: Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc1

2007-05-15 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:45:46AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, 14 May 2007 07:49:31 +0200 (MEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > > > On May 14 2007 10:55, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > >On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 11:27:31AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > >> On May 12 2007 20:20, Linus Torvalds wr

Re: Fwd: Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc1

2007-05-15 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Wed, 16 May 2007 00:42:08 +0900 Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:45:46AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Mon, 14 May 2007 07:49:31 +0200 (MEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 14 2007 10:55, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > > >On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 11:27:31AM +0200

Fix section conflict of acpi_rs_match_vendor_resource

2007-05-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Building with GCC 4.2, I get the following error: CC drivers/acpi/resources/rsxface.o drivers/acpi/resources/rsxface.c:479: error: __ksymtab_acpi_rs_match_vendor_resource causes a section type conflict This is because acpi_rs_match_vendor_resource is both declared static and exported. Si

[solved] 2.6.21 -- polling /proc/acpi/battery/*/state breaks ibm_acpi

2007-05-15 Thread Andreas Messer
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:04:25AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 14 May 2007, Andreas Messer wrote: > > Up to Kernel 2.6.20 ibm_acpi was working fine on my TP X21. > > At least all Fn + Keys worked. Now, since 2.6.21 it generally > > works but: When some Application is pollin

Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Remove possible recursion from thermal driver

2007-05-15 Thread Len Brown
> --- a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c > @@ -1106,7 +1106,6 @@ static void acpi_thermal_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 > event, void *data) > break; > case ACPI_THERMAL_NOTIFY_THRESHOLDS: > acpi_thermal_get_trip_points(tz); >-

Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Remove possible recursion from thermal driver

2007-05-15 Thread Alexey Starikovskiy
Please read the spec 11.1.2 and 11.1.2.3. Trip points change _only_ to create a hysteresis loop, not by themselves. This means that we will get 0x81 type _only_ in response to us changing active state, the moment then we have temperature and just decided to move away from this trip point, not clos

Re: Fwd: Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc1

2007-05-15 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:46:21AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2007 00:42:08 +0900 Mattia Dongili wrote: ... > > Given the drivers/acpi/Kconfig portion > > > > if ACPI > > ... > > config ACPI_EC > > bool > > default y > > help > > ...

Re: [PATCH 1/9] libata: separate out ata_dev_reread_id()

2007-05-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
Tejun Heo wrote: Separate out ata_dev_reread_id() from ata_dev_revalidate(). ata_dev_reread_id() reads IDENTIFY page and determines whether the same device is still there. ata_dev_revalidate() reconfigures after reread completes. This will be used by ACPI update. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMA