Oops. Sorry.
Attached here. :)
Thanks,
Rui
-Original Message-
From: Len Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 1:01 PM
To: Zhang, Rui
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: export ACPI events via acpi_mc_group
either my mail client is smarter than I am,
or the new acpi_genl demo program was not attached to your message --
can you send it along?
thanks,
-Len
On Friday 20 July 2007 04:41, Zhang Rui wrote:
> This is an incremental patch for the recent genetlink
> multicast changes.
>
> Now ACPI events a
Applied.
thanks,
-Len
On Monday 09 July 2007 14:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> git-acpi contains a patch that adds 'struct bin_attribute *' to
> the read method of struct bin_attribute. This breaks s390:
>
> CC arch/s390/kernel/ipl.o
> arch/s39
applied (w/ updated 5/7)
thanks,
-Len
On Sunday 15 July 2007 13:34, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Hi Len,
>
> These patches a targeted to 2.6.23.
> I updated the previous series with a couple more patches one of which fixes a
> bug present in 2.6.22 and that I'll push to the stable maintainers.
> Impo
okay, I replaced the original 5/7 with this one.
thanks,
-Len
ps. helpful when you can include "sony-laptop:" on the subject line
On Thursday 19 July 2007 13:01, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Hi,
> the following is the only way I could think of to hide some events as
> per Dmitry suggestions while sti
Applied.
thanks,
-Len
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 22:45, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> Len,
>
> Please pull from:
>
> git://repo.or.cz/linux-2.6/linux-acp
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Thomas Renninger wrote:
Hi David,
Could this problem have to do with this one:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=180390
Tell me if you have problems accessing the bug, it should be public.
Unfortunately the ongoing of the bug stopped a bit for various reasons.
i
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
should I test the two individually? or just plan on useing both from now
on?
I normally disable PnP (both ISA and PCI), should I leave it enabled with
the newer kernels and this motherboard?
Ultimately, you should have CONFIG_ACPI=y and CONFIG_PNPACPI=y
sorry for the long delay in testing.
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
[adding [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:38:17 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:56:17 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
due to the
On Thursday 19 July 2007, Shaohua Li wrote:
>
> applied after Rafel's 'PM: Update global suspend and hibernation
> operations framework' patch set
>
> Hook acpi d-state to pnp suspend/resume.
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Looks about right, and I know the "punt to the PNP prot
10 matches
Mail list logo