2.6.24-rc4 on a Lenovo t61p, using FC8 config.
echo mem /sys/power/state while running X.
It appears to suspend OK but then it instantly resumes and runs
OK except the display is blank.
A copy of /proc/acpi/dsdt is at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dsdt.t61p
config:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:50:02AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Hi Len,
after booting 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 (2.6.24-rc4-190-g94545ba, otoh, boots just
fine) on my asus laptop, the machine reboots after claiming that
Critical temperature reached (255 C). However, the degrees number
is
Le Monday 05 November 2007 13:19:20 Alexander Pugachev, vous avez écrit :
Hello.
I see in dmesg output this lines:
[ 34.68] Asus Laptop ACPI Extras version 0.30
[ 34.68] BSTS called, 0x7f returned
[ 34.68] unsupported model A6Rp, trying default values
[ 34.68]
Le Wednesday 21 November 2007 23:50:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED], vous avez
écrit :
From: Luca Tettamanti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add support for ASUS F3Sa notebook. Features:
- LCD on/off
- Brightness
- Wifi kill
- Bluetooth kill
I don't think it's a good idea to add features to the old driver. We
Andrew Morton wrote:
2.6.24-rc4 on a Lenovo t61p, using FC8 config.
echo mem /sys/power/state while running X.
It appears to suspend OK but then it instantly resumes and runs
OK except the display is blank.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9258
I have a X61 tablet, and the
On Sunday, 9 of December 2007, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
2.6.24-rc4 on a Lenovo t61p, using FC8 config.
echo mem /sys/power/state while running X.
It appears to suspend OK but then it instantly resumes and runs
OK except the display is blank.
Andreas Mohr wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:20:01AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Does this report now win me the lucky draw, pretty please? ;)
nah, you have to cc the acpi guys to get a prize ;)
Thought so shortly, but missed it.
Andreas, please do separately report that WOL
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:46:57AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Please post full kernel boot log and the result of 'lspci -nn'.
Done, on #9530.
Will try some of the promising patches/suggestions now, hopefully this will
show me what's up. Will add further results there.
Andreas Mohr
-
To
Hi,
[ACPI _GTM suspend issue sorta fixed, read below]
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 12:24:16PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:20:01AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 11:12:57 +0100 Andreas Mohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ACPI Exception
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 04:12:25PM -0500, Elvis Pranskevichus wrote:
Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:22:34 -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 01:05:54 +0100
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:51:54PM -0500, Mike Houston
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 01:19:28 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
2.6.24-rc4 on a Lenovo t61p, using FC8 config.
echo mem /sys/power/state while running X.
On Fedora you should use System-Suspend or /usr/bin/pm-suspend from pm-
utils. See also /usr/share/hal/fdi/information/10freedesktop/20-video-
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 10:36:42PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
And the second, possibly much more lucrative, question would be
whether we're actually doing something wrong with our ACPI _GTM execution
which triggers the AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT problem.
This might help here, perhaps
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:40:07 +0100 Tomas Carnecky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
2.6.24-rc4 on a Lenovo t61p, using FC8 config.
echo mem /sys/power/state while running X.
It appears to suspend OK but then it instantly resumes and runs
OK except the display is blank.
On Monday, 10 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:40:07 +0100 Tomas Carnecky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
2.6.24-rc4 on a Lenovo t61p, using FC8 config.
echo mem /sys/power/state while running X.
It appears to suspend OK but then it
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 01:04:31AM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
IOW, it seems very likely that _GTM on these BIOSes (VIA chipsets) isn't
actually wrongly implemented but simply expects IDE controller values
to have been set up differently.
Or... one could possibly even infer from this that -
Andreas Mohr wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 01:04:31AM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
IOW, it seems very likely that _GTM on these BIOSes (VIA chipsets) isn't
actually wrongly implemented but simply expects IDE controller values
to have been set up differently.
Or... one could possibly even infer
Andreas Mohr wrote:
As such one can conclude that this BIOS is rather very confused when being
called for _GTM on an entirely
unused controller port. And this is either because the BIOS is dumb or
because ACPI doesn't really
expect anyone to call _GTM on an unused physical port. I'd bet on
Robert Hancock wrote:
And you're quite right in your comment that we are often too quick to
blacklist hardware instead of looking into why it really is failing.
ACPI is one of those areas where we often just need to figure out how to
be bug-to-bug compatibile with what Windows is doing..
In
On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 23:04 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 04:12:25PM -0500, Elvis Pranskevichus wrote:
Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:22:34 -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 01:05:54 +0100
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday December 9 2007 09:31:27 pm Shaohua Li wrote:
On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 23:04 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 04:12:25PM -0500, Elvis Pranskevichus wrote:
Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:22:34 -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
On Sun, 9 Dec
Tejun Heo wrote:
Robert Hancock wrote:
And you're quite right in your comment that we are often too quick to
blacklist hardware instead of looking into why it really is failing.
ACPI is one of those areas where we often just need to figure out how to
be bug-to-bug compatibile with what Windows
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:31:27 +0800
Shaohua Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This should exist in previous kernel (before we remove acpi
motherboard driver) too. Basically it's a broken BIOS. Could below
patch work around it?
Thanks,
Shaohua
Index: linux/drivers/pnp/system.c
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:04:13 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Monday, 10 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:40:07 +0100 Tomas Carnecky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
2.6.24-rc4 on a Lenovo t61p, using FC8 config.
23 matches
Mail list logo
