[RFC] [PATCH] ACPI: ignore the error about the _CRS of LINK device

Hi, All The following error message can be found in the dmesg of bug8896. ACPI Error (uteval-0269): Return object type is incorrect [\_SB_.PCI0.ALKD._CRS] (Node da4b49f0), AE_TYPE ACPI Error (uteval-0275): Type returned from _CRS was incorrect: Integer, expected Btypes: 4

Re: suspend to RAM failure on t61p

On Monday, 10 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:04:13 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday, 10 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:40:07 +0100 Tomas Carnecky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton

Re: [PATCH] Recent Lenovo ThinkPads define a dummy grahpics device, find it and ignore it

On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 22:50 +, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:55:13PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: Hi Matthew, I posted this one already and you had some concerns about it: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org/msg09510.html IMO, this one

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9533] New: 2.6.24-rc4: some ahci/acpi interaction causes delays during boot

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 05:55:20 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9533 Another box-killing regression to track, please. Either ATA or ACPI. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9533] New: 2.6.24-rc4: some ahci/acpi interaction causes delays during boot

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:52:43 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 05:55:20 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9533 Another box-killing regression to track, please. Either ATA or ACPI. er, no, not box-killing -

Re: [RFC] EC registers - Adding sysfs interface?

On Fri, 07 Dec 2007, Thomas Renninger wrote: I see the danger of applications misusing this as an interface and implementing workarounds for unsupported ACPI parts and (this is the real problem) stop working on the real problems or a proper implementation. Exactly. Or causing shadow issues

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9533] New: 2.6.24-rc4: some ahci/acpi interaction causes delays during boot

On 12/10/2007 03:52 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 05:55:20 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9533 Another box-killing regression to track, please. Either ATA or ACPI. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH 0/4, v3] Physical PCI slot objects

Hi Kenji-san, I have been thinking about this problem for quite a bit, and think that there are no good solutions... * Kenji Kaneshige [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On my system, hotplug slots themselves can be added, removed and replaced with the ohter type of I/O box. Are you talking about some sort

Re: RFC: PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path

On Friday 07 December 2007 12:13:35 am Shaohua Li wrote: On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 02:24 +0800, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: Index: linux-mm/drivers/pnp/driver.c === --- linux-mm.orig/drivers/pnp/driver.c 2007-11-30 13:58:25.0

Re: suspend to RAM failure on t61p

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:06:14 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday, 10 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:04:13 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday, 10 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 09 Dec

Re: suspend to RAM failure on t61p

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:21:56 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However reverting 9cd9a0058dd35268b24fa16795a92c800f4086d4 does not fix the machine-reboots-after-resume-from-disk regression. It gets to here: Attempting manual resume swsusp: Marking nosave pages: