> Now, what should we do about it? Add a quirk to always define the Linux OSI
> string on ThinkPads (based on DMI information)? All IBM ones (which won't
> have BIOS revisions anymore, anyway) deal well with it, and Lenovo ones
> seem to benefit from it.
If Lenovo systems do the right thing then
> + max_devices = ata_link_max_devices(&ap->link);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < max_devices; ++i) {
> + struct ata_device *dev = &ap->link.device[i];
Better to use:
ata_link_for_each_dev(dev, &ap->link) {
> +
> + if (dev->acpi_handle)
> +
> ACPI Exception (exoparg2-0442): AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Index
> (0) is beyond end of object [20070126]
> ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed
> [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.GTM_] (Node 810100318a20), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
> ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:40:01 -0400
Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > +Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007
> > +Copyright (C) 2007 SUSE Linux GmbH
>
> While it seems to be generally customary to identify the authors of
> Documentation
> files, it doesn't seem to be customary for
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:22:05 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1162fb7..93a100b 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -251,6 +251,9 @@ L:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 20:46:20 +0200 (CEST)
Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 9 2007 17:45, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> >> This patch contains the scheduled removal of the ACPI procfs interface.
> >
> >What part of "we do not gratuitously br
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 16:57:56 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch contains the scheduled removal of the ACPI procfs interface.
NAK
What part of "we do not gratuitously break user space interfaces" is so
hard for people to understand.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Tue, 15 May 2007 03:28:15 +0900
Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is the third take of improve-ata-acpi. Except for regeneration
> to fit the current libata-dev#upstream[U], there's no change from
> the last take[L].
Looks good to me within the constraints of the actual
> * after successfully executing _GTF taskfiles, IDENTIFY page is
> reloaded
Interesting question we should sort out: What is our identify page as
supplied to the user meant to be ?
The old IDE one started off as the "identify data at boot" (which is
useful) and mutated through a million "kind
> > Take the ACPI handle, go look for _GTF, _SDD etc and believe the
> > firmware. Nothing else works.
>
> Actually, that's dangerous. For example, you must not do _STM/_GTM on
> ahci becuase _STM/_GTM access PCI config registers which must not be
> accessed in achi modes and some BIOSen supply t
> The ACPI interface to use can only be safely determined one way - and
> that is to see what methods the BIOS has attached to the device and use
> those.
>
> Take the ACPI handle, go look for _GTF, _SDD etc and believe the
> firmware. Nothing else works.
Actually its even worse a mess than I tho
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 02:41:06 +0900
Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whether a controller needs IDE or SATA ACPI hierarchy is determined by
> the programming interface of the controller not by whether the
> controller is SATA or PATA
NAK
I keep trying to point out that this is not true.
Th
; will be used later to determine whether _SDD is necessary or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PRO
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 02:41:05 +0900
Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Consolidate common port flags into AHCI_FLAG_COMMON.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:48:00 +0100
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. How about this? Couple of cleanups, and leaves the possibility for
> drivers to pass in their own gtf structure.
Looks better, I can work with that for pata_acpi nicely
> + acpidata = kzalloc(sizeof(struct
> Ok, missed that. How about something like the following? I've changed
> some of the interfaces slightly, so the pata_acpi driver would need to
> be altered to match. This gets rid of the CABLE_SATA checking in
Close but no cigar. The pata_acpi driver needs to be able to pass its own
pointer f
> should they be attached to the scsi code rather than the ata host code?
> Anyway, this fixes suspend/resume on nc6220, which is what I was aiming
> for...
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
NAK - there is code to do the _gtm/_stm parts in the -mm tree already
used by pata_
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 04:22:23 +0100
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've ported the drivers/ide code for handling _GTM and _STM to libata.
> I'm not utterly convinced that I'm doing the calls in the right place -
Please see the various patches I've posted or the -mm tree. I did that
> Subject: libata: PATA UDMA/100 configured as UDMA/33
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/20/294
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide@vger.kernel.org/msg04115.html
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8133
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org
> It sounds like your tree is out-of-date. Your patch to fix that went in
> days ago, applied by Linus directly:
Its purposefully not tracking every Linus update so I can build a
replicable environment. I missed the list mail it went in tho.
> I lean towards disabling it by default in 2.6.21 an
> I think it might be better to give up ACPI support in 2.6.21 and target
> 2.6.22. What do you think?
I removed it from my tree already so that I can actually use libata and
do real work. The "crash every non PCI controller" feature in the current
ACPI hacks means PCMCIA and ISAPnP do not work a
> Subject: libata: PATA UDMA/100 configured as UDMA/33
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/20/294
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide@vger.kernel.org/msg04115.html
> Submitter : Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Handled-By : Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Status
Ar Iau, 2006-10-19 am 16:11 -0400, ysgrifennodd Dave Jones:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:16:44PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > Why smp_found_config isn't set in that guys configuration is a mystery to
> me,
> > as his MPS tables look sane..
> >
> > MP Table:
> > # APIC ID Version State
Ar Iau, 2006-09-07 am 16:13 -0700, ysgrifennodd Kristen Carlson Accardi:
> the exact same event for either insertion or removal (i.e. the Dell M65 for
> example). Same scripts for using these events and udev can be found on the
> thinkwiki website:
>
> http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/How_to_hotswap
Ar Gwe, 2006-09-01 am 23:52 +0200, ysgrifennodd Andi Kleen:
> What are these gaping holes? SATA seems to work at least on many
> drivers with an out of tree patch (that will hopefully be merged soon)
SATA ought to be pretty good now.
> And IDE mostly works too except for HPA on thinkpads (which
Ar Sul, 2006-07-09 am 05:22 -0700, ysgrifennodd Andrew Morton:
> > ata5: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1F0 ctl 0x3F6 bmdma 0x30B0 irq 14
> > scsi4 : ata_piix
> > ata5.00: ATAPI, max UDMA/66
> > ata5.00: configured for UDMA/66
More ATAPI devices getting uppity about mode setting.
> John stuff. I suspec
On Mer, 2006-02-01 at 20:35 -0500, Brown, Len wrote:
> This endeavor is full of risk, and I would be extremely careful
> about enabling features that the BIOS explicitly disabled --
> unless the hardware manufacturer publicly publishes
> support for the feature, or the errata that you're working ar
27 matches
Mail list logo
