On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 16:57:42 +0530
"Andev Debi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/2/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Please fix the wordwrapping before sending any more stuff - it's truly
> >> awful.
> >
> Sorry about th
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:24:48 -0400
"Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 2.6.23-rc2-mm1 #7
> ---
> kacpid/53 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&ec->lock){--..}, at: [] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x1f
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 15:39:30 +0300 (EEST) "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I noticed that v2.6.23-rc1 locks up during boot, same thing happens now
> with the latest linus' tree (+net-2.6.24 and tcp-2.6 tree stuff on top
> of it; in -rc1 test they weren't though). The exact location
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:20:46 +0300 (EEST) "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 15:39:30 +0300 (EEST) "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:15:51 +0300 (EEST) "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:20:46 +0300 (EEST) "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Su
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:14:11 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8886
>
>Summary: No more battery info with 2.6.23 kernels
>Product: ACPI
>Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.23-rc3
> Platform: All
>
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 01:33:48 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8919
>
>Summary: Broken hotkeys on ASUS A6Km notebook with 2.6.23-rc3.
>Product: ACPI
>Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.23-rc3
> Platf
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 01:27:25 +0200
Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 22.08.2007 11:06 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc3/2.6.23-rc3-mm1/
>
> After applying Matthew Wilcox' patch to include/l
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 02:47:59 +0200 Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 25.08.2007 02:07 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> > On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 01:27:25 +0200
> > Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Am 22.08.2007 11:06 schrieb Andrew Mo
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8243
This is presently assigned to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Should it
be assigned to acpi instead?
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:47:36 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8958
>
>Summary: regression: fan doesn't work anymore
>Product: ACPI
>Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.23-rc4
> Platform: All
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:59:50 +0200 Lionel Landwerlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
Three weeks, no responses.
> I'm using 2.6.22.1 on my macbook (32bits). I had got this trace a few
> hours after a suspend to disk. I never got this kind of trace without
> suspend. I will try to reproduce with 2
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:29:18 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8995
>
>Summary: /proc/acpi/alarm worked; update to 2.6.22.2 and
> /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm don't
>Product: ACPI
>Version: 2.
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:50:05 +0800 Zhang Rui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Oliver,
> Thanks for your comments,
>
> On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 18:45 +0800, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Montag 20 August 2007 schrieb Zhang Rui:
> > > Files name must be unique in the same directory.
> > >
> > > Bug is r
On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 13:35:26 +0200
Patrizio Bassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patrizio Bassi ha scritto:
> > Jan Engelhardt ha scritto:
> >> On Sep 8 2007 11:38, Patrizio Bassi wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >>>
> I shall give this a spin too, since I happen to have sis5513.
>
> From: Zhang Rui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> File name should be unique in the same directory.
>
> In order to keep the back-compatibility, only a warning is given
> currently, but actions must be taken to fix it when such duplicates
> are detected.
>
> Bug report and a simple fix can be found here
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:14:08 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + if (!hibernation_ops)
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +
> + /*
> + * We have cancelled the power transition by running
> + * hibernation_ops->finish() before saving the image, so we should let
(cc restored. Please always do reply-to-all)
(linux-acpi cc added)
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:00:41 +0200 "tx tox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12 Lip 2006, 00:41, Eric Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When I try toboota 2.6.17 kernel compiled forSMP(hyperthreading),
> > it hangs early in
It suspends OK, then during resume it gets partway through it, then everything
just stops.
Would prefer not to have to bisect this one - I've done enough bisecting this
week to last a lifetime, and bisecting git-acpi is painful due to build bustage
at various points (cpuidle).
-
To unsubscribe fr
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:12:13 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It suspends OK, then during resume it gets partway through it, then everything
> just stops.
>
> Would prefer not to have to bisect this one - I've done enough bisecting this
> week to l
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:21:41 -0400 Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 September 2007 00:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > It suspends OK, then during resume it gets partway through it, then
> > everything
> > just stops.
>
> Hmmm, i th
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:58:18 -0400
Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 September 2007 13:07, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > This breakage in git-acpi is new, I think. Four or five days ago, git-acpi
> > _fixed_ suspend/resume on Linus's tree. Now it br
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:59:04 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 18 September 2007 13:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 18 September 2007 06:40, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:12:13 -0700 Andrew Morto
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:42:25 +0200
From: Michael Gerdau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 and acpi
Hi,
while trying to compile 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 I came across the following
build error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/linux-2.6.23-rc6-mm1>
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:28:30 -0400 Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 23 September 2007 20:57, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Wha? Seems that the cpuidle patches all got dropped, but the x86_64
> > dynticks patches were fairly heavily dependent upon t
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:51:09 +0200 Damien Wyart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After testing rc8, I noticed that I couldn't power off the computer
> directly, it only got halted and I had to press the power button
> manually. Just before displaying "System halted", the following message
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:45:15 +0400 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> [fix-ACPI_SLEEP_states.patch text/x-patch (2.0KB)]
> ACPI: suspend: fix ACPI_SLEEP states
>
> From: Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
>
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 23:10:47 -0400 Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> please pull from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release
>
> ...
>
> drivers/acpi/battery.c | 1038 +
Does this introduce the problem which Zan Lynx repor
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:39:14 -0600 Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- w.orig/include/linux/pnp.h2007-09-13 16:25:48.0 -0600
> +++ w/include/linux/pnp.h 2007-09-13 16:26:04.0 -0600
> @@ -8,6 +8,10 @@
>
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PNP_DEBUG
> +
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 02:37:35 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9155
>
>Summary: No fan control with ATI Radeon display support on HP
> nx6125.
>Product: Drivers
>Version: 2.5
> KernelVersi
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:39:30 +0200 Maxim Levitsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A while ago I asked on LKML about the problem of loosing all wake device
> capabilities, after a suspend to disk
> (eg: I can't wake the system from keyboard if I suspend to disk and then to
> ram)
>
> I was provided
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:33:07 +0200 Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: linux-acpi
> Cc: linux-kernel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew
> Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, J
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:31:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it seems Len's test tree and Linus tree diverged a bit, at least with
> this patch set things do not apply cleanly.
>
> Therefore I post these for discussion whether and in which kernel tree
> they should end up befo
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:51:35 +0200
Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:57:23 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:31:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > it seems Len's te
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:20:29 -0700 Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [PATCH] x86: check boundary in count/setup_resource called by
> get_current_resources
>
> need to check info->res_num less than PCI_BUS_NUM_RESOURCES, so
> info->bus->resource[info->res_num] = res will not beyond of bus r
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:11:04 +0100
Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> sometime on resuming from s2ram my laptop spew the following oops.
> Config, dmesg etc are at:
>
> http://www.dea.icai.upcomillas.es/romano/linux/info/2624rc1_6/
>
> [3.475386] Oops: [#1]
this patch introduces a compile error:
drivers/acpi/osl.c:1203: error: conflicting types for 'acpi_os_validate_address'
include/acpi/acpiosxf.h:243: error: previous declaration of
'acpi_os_validate_address' was here
which the next patch fixes. This breaks git-bisection and will cause great
gnas
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 13:35:00 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9320
>
>Summary: PATA scan: ACPI Exception AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT... is
> beyond end of object
>Product: ACPI
>Version: 2.5
>
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:02:56 -0500 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:49:58AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:43:59 +0100 Roberto Oppedisano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > Andrew Mort
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:19:05 -0500 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:13:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:02:56 -0500 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 0
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:49:33 -0500 Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:19:05 -0500 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:13:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>>
A> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:35:23 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> [remove_cycle_at_battery_removal.patch text/x-patch (1.7KB)]
> ACPI: Battery: remove cycle from battery removal.
>
> From: Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> get_property() should not call battery_up
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 23:12:18 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9334
>
>Summary: Kernel 2.6.22 computer turn off
>Product: Other
>Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.22
> Platform: All
> OS/V
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 12:36:43 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > A> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:35:23 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> [remove_cycle_at_battery_removal.patch text/x-pa
(cc's added)
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 09:47:02 +0100 SANGOI DINO LEONARDO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My laptop (an HP nx6125) doesn't boot with kernels 2.6.24-rc1 and
> 2.6.24.rc2.
> It works fine with 2.6.23 and older.
>
> I seen this bug first while running fedora rawhide, so you can
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 14:20:56 +0100
Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two cleanups to :
> * Stop defining acpi_mp_config, it isn't used anywhere.
> * Discard nested "#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI", they are useless and
> error-prone.
It's not a good time to be doing not-strictly-needed cleanup patch
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:05:53 + Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ata9.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xa0)
> > > ata9.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
> > > ata9.00: cmd a0/00:00:00:02:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0 cdb 0x5a data 2
> > > in
> > > res 51/54:03:00:02
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:35:18 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I can not contact with Len for several days, while the oops on battery
> seems quite important.
> It also seem to behave well in -mm tree (as part of Len's acpi-test).
> Will you send this patch to Linus without
(switched to email. Please reply via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:56:13 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9398
>
>Summary: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
>Product:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:41:23 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Kernel panic's across different architectures like powerpc, x86_64,
powerpc complains about IO-APICs??
> Dentry cache hash table entries: 8388608 (order: 14, 67108864 bytes)
> Inode-cache hash table
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:52:26 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:41:23 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> Kernel
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:39:43 -0500
Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:18:39 -0800
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > ..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
> > > Kernel panic - not syncing: IO-A
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:08:33 +0100
Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/26/2007 09:45 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:39:43 -0500
> >> Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:09:51 +0300
Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> >
> >> Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> >>
> >>> cat
> >>> /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/PNP0A08:00/device:19/PNP0C0A:00/power_
> >>> supply/BAT1/status
>
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:14:17 +0100
Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/26/2007 11:17 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> Maybe if you can emit a broken-out with the fresh pull to test?
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ is current. But it probably w
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:06:55 -0800
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please dont go off-list like this. I put Mark's original mailing list cc's
back.
>
> I will have to Nack this. The reason max_cstate was initentionally
> removed due to couple of reasons:
It broke userspace wi
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:14:08 -0500 Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > latency. If your app cant take any latency, you should set those... and
> > the side effect is that the kernel will not do long-latency C-states or
> > P-state transitions..
> ..
>
> I don't mind the cpufreq changing (act
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 11:12:57 +0100 Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:36:31AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Subject : PATA scan: ACPI Exception AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT... is
> > > beyond end of object
> &
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:53:47 -0500
"Parag Warudkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Got this on today's git (2.6.24-rc4) while compiling stuff - Looks
> like it is related to CpuIdle stuff.
> I chose CONFIG_CPU_IDLE for the first time so I don't know when this
> was introduced.
>
> This is on x86_32
2.6.24-rc4 on a Lenovo t61p, using FC8 config.
echo mem > /sys/power/state while running X.
It appears to suspend OK but then it instantly resumes and runs
OK except the display is blank.
A copy of /proc/acpi/dsdt is at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dsdt.t61p
config: http://userweb.kernel.org
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:40:07 +0100 Tomas Carnecky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 2.6.24-rc4 on a Lenovo t61p, using FC8 config.
> >
> > echo mem > /sys/power/state while running X.
> >
> > It appears to suspend OK but then it in
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:04:13 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Monday, 10 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:40:07 +0100 Tomas Carnecky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 05:55:20 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9533
Another box-killing regression to track, please. Either ATA or ACPI.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROT
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:52:43 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 05:55:20 -0800 (PST)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9533
>
> Another box-killing regression to track, please. Either AT
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:06:14 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Monday, 10 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:04:13 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
>
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:21:56 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However reverting 9cd9a0058dd35268b24fa16795a92c800f4086d4 does not fix the
> machine-reboots-after-resume-from-disk regression.
>
> It gets to here:
>
> Attempting manual resume
> s
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:58:58 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:21:56 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > However reverting 9cd9a0058dd35268b24fa16795a92c800f4086d4 does not fix the
> > machine-reboots-aft
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:57:51 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now let me see what caused the keystrokes-no-longer-trigger-resume-from-RAM
> regression.
OK, I must have dreamed this - 2.6.23 requires a power-button tap to
come back from suspend-to-RAM as well.
-
To
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:25:57 -0700 Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew, can you add this before
> pnp-request-ioport-and-iomem-resources-used-by-active-devices.patch?
>
> ...
>
> PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path
I did, but I also temporarily dropped
pnp-request-
(switching to email - please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface)
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:18:05 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9555
>
>Summary: Suspend to RAM horks keyboard autorepeat, system bell,
>
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:24:32 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, 14 of December 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > ia64 allmodconfig:
> >
> > kernel/power/main
ster_driver+0x3a/0x3c
> [] acpi_video_init+0x32/0x51 [video]
> [] sys_init_module+0x142b/0x14f4
> [] sysenter_past_esp+0x6b/0xc1
> =======
> EIP: 0060:[] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 0
> EIP is at __list_add+0x34/0x4a
Well, that's a list_head handling bug in drivers/ac
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:26:11 -0500 Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> please pull from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release
>
> This will update the files shown below.
>
> thanks!
>
> -Len
>
> ps. individual patches are available on linux-acp
When I fire up the latest Linus tree on my thinkpad t61p I get:
thinkpad_acpi: ThinkPad ACPI Extras v0.17
thinkpad_acpi: http://ibm-acpi.sf.net/
thinkpad_acpi: ThinkPad BIOS 7LET44WW (1.14 ), EC 7KHT22WW-1.06
thinkpad_acpi: Lenovo ThinkPad T61p
thinkpad_acpi: radio switch found; radios are enable
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 13:00:19 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9627
Looks like another regression to track, please.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:08:37 -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > When I fire up the latest Linus tree on my thinkpad t61p I get:
> >
> > thinkpad_acpi: ThinkPad ACPI Extras v0.17
> > thin
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 07:34:06 + Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 12:00:57AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > and /sys/class/backlight/thinkpad_screen/brightness is no longer present, so
> > my `brightness' script no longer w
Another regression.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:07:30 -0800 (PST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9663] New: in 2.6.24-rc6 function keys on my notebook
doesn`t work
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9663
Summa
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:06:20 -0800 "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Mark Lord [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 3:42 PM
> >To: Arjan van de Ven
> >Cc: P
e's scripts (ie: Mark's) were writing to it.
As an unhappy compromise, make max_cstate writeable again if the kernel was
configured without CONFIG_CPU_IDLE.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:53:38 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Fix /proc/acpi/alarm to not overwrite the RTC century field when setting a
> wake alarm. The alarm hardware doesn't have a century field, and we really
> should not be fiddling with the RTC cent
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:05:34 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9721
>
>Summary: wake on lan fails with sky2 module
>Product:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:38:25 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9731
>
>Summary: 2.6.24-rc7: Deadlock when any ACPI eject sys node
> written
>Product: ACPI
>Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:46:13 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The first patch in the series introduces such a mechanism. The remaining
> > three
> > patches modify the MSR, x86-64 MCE and cpuid drivers in accordance with the
> > above appr
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 00:32:44 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some device drivers register CPU hotplug notifiers and use them to destroy
> device objects when removing the corresponding CPUs and to create these
> objects
> when adding the CPUs back.
>
> Unfortunately, this i
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:11:52 -0500 (EST) Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:49:04PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > err, no. pm-introduce-destroy_suspended_device.patch demolishes
&g
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:08:38 +0100 supersud501 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> supersud501 wrote:
> >
> >
> > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Since it seems to be 100% reproducible, it would be very helpful if
> >> you could
> >> use git-bisect to identify the offending commit.
> >>
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:27:40 +0100 supersud501 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > So simply reverting this:
> >
> > commit ac93a3946b676025fa55356180e8321639744b31
> > Author: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTE
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:39:26 -0800
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/sky2.c b/drivers/net/sky2.c
> > index c27c7d6..4f41a94 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/sky2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/sky2.c
> > @@ -2791,6 +2791,9 @@ static void sky2_reset(struct sky2_hw *hw)
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:19:42 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9747
>
>Summary: Oops on boot from laptop mode writing to
> /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
>Product: ACPI
>Version: 2.5
>
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:16:22 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-17 02:35:14]:
>
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc8/2.6.24-rc8-mm1/
> >
> > -
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:22:19 -0800 "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> The problem is
> >> modprobe:2584 conflicting cache attribute 5000-50001000
> >> uncached<->default
>
> Some address range here is being mapped with conflicting types.
> Somewhere the range was mapped
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:05:28 +0100
supersud501 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Please test this patch against Linus's current (approx 2.6.24-rc7-git5).
> > Ignore Andrew's premature reversion attempt...
> >
> > This patch disables config mode access after clearing
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:03:18 -0700 Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +static void quirk_supermicro_h8dce_system(struct pnp_dev *dev)
hm. If you trace back through the callchain here is seems that large
amounts of the pnp code could be made __init/__initdata. The two callers
of pnp_add
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:53:18 +0100 "Miguel Ojeda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Booting 2.6.24-rc8 I get this:
>
>
> sysfs: duplicate filename 'fan' can not be created
> WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:424 sysfs_add_one()
> Pid: 819, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.24-rc8 #2
> [] sysfs_add_one+0x9f/0
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:44:48 -0500 Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 December 2007 21:03, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > The sysfs backlight class provides no mechanism for querying the
> > acceptable brightness for a backlight. The ACPI spec states that values
> > are only valid
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:25:50 + Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 10:00:45PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > - Create a new /sys node with a new name which has the new semantics.
>
> The semantics are the same as they always have be
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 04:43:49 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9835
>
>Summary: After Hibernation the battery charging information is
> not working any more.
>Product: Power Management
>Version
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:00:14 +0100 Toralf Förster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(suitable cc's added)
> I'm asking b/c this confuses the current sysstat up to version 8.0.4. An
That would be bad. Please define "confuses"?
> $ ls -lR /sys/devices/system/cpu/
>
> gives :
>
> /sys/devices/system/c
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:05:41 +0100 (CET)
Guennadi Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Don't know if this should be considered a bug-report, or just another ACPI
> bug on my system. In any case, if the CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR is enabled, on
> first boot after a power off the system is
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo
