On Thu 21. Feb - 04:37:45, Len Brown wrote:
> sorry if this is a repeat.
> backing down to git 1.5.4 to see if it can send
> messages that vger.kernel.org likes...
Any specific reason why the patch I sent one week ago should not not go
into 2.6.25-rc2?
ACPI: Do not pass NULL to acpi_get_handle(
When trying to get the acpi_handle from an acpi_buffer, pass
ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT instead of NULL to acpi_get_handle(). This fixes the
detection of dock dependent bays.
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 3fac011..d
On Tue 12. Jun - 00:12:00, Holger Macht wrote:
> Send key=value pair along with the uevent instead of a plain value so that
> userspace (udev) can handle it like common environment variables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Len, maybe this on accidentally sl
Send key=value pair along with the uevent instead of a plain value so that
userspace (udev) can handle it like common environment variables.
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Patch applies to recent acpi-test tree
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bay.c b/drivers/acpi/bay.c
diff
On Fri 08. Jun - 09:04:03, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2036 16:00:45 +0100
> Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri 08. Jun - 18:47:06, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Also, I'd really like to receive ACPI dockin
cute a kobject_uevent(). So wouldn't it be save to execute
the dock_event() _after_ actually undocking? Something like the following?
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
index 4546bf8..46df53e 100644
--- a/driver
On Tue 20. Mar - 09:19:32, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:53:21 +0100
> Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon 19. Mar - 11:04:12, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:55:30 +0100
> > >
On Tue 20. Mar - 17:07:07, Holger Macht wrote:
> On Mon 19. Mar - 11:11:09, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:37:46 +0100
> > Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Sure. What actually bothers me is that in its current
On Mon 19. Mar - 11:11:09, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:37:46 +0100
> Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sure. What actually bothers me is that in its current state, the dock
> > station driver signals 'green' on
On Mon 19. Mar - 11:04:12, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:55:30 +0100
> Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun 18. Mar - 15:36:52, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Holger Macht wrote:
> > &g
On Mon 19. Mar - 12:36:59, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > But you still have to deal with mounted filesystems, no matter if it a
> > > cardbus or a cdrom. Wouldn't we need something like 'save removal'
> > > triggered from userspace like you m
On Mon 19. Mar - 14:04:03, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 02:48:22PM +0100, Holger Macht wrote:
>
> > 1. libata integration into the bay driver
>
> It actually makes sense to tie all PATA/SATA devices to their ACPI
> handles where appropriate - there
On Mon 19. Mar - 13:22:43, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 09:27:51AM +0100, Holger Macht wrote:
>
> > I don't prefer any solution, whether doing it inside the kernel, or doing
> > it in userspace. What would be good would be to know what's the '
On Sun 18. Mar - 15:36:52, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Holger Macht wrote:
> > those ThinkPads where it is needed. Afterwards it does the corresponding
> > dock/undock request on ibm_acpi. And this works reliably good what I can
> > see from the f
On Sun 18. Mar - 14:38:42, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> >> 1. It will handle all device types (ATAPI, PATA, SATA, batteries);
> >>
> >> 2. It will do the right thing on plug and unplug. This means telling the
> >> rest of the kernel to disable the device in the b
On Thu 15. Mar - 12:37:32, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:17:21 -0700
> Chris Wedgwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:51:14PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >
> > > This patch allows for ibm-acpi to coexist (with diminished
> > >
On Sat 10. Feb - 10:27:14, Ismail Dönmez wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 February 2007 21:18:50 Len Brown wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > please pull from:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git
> > release
> >
> > ACPICA Core version 2070126 simplifies the ACPI table m
On Mon 11. Dec - 12:05:08, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:59:58 +0100
> Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, I like to have them ;-)
>
> Ok - how is this?
Looks good to me, thanks!
> Send a uevent to indicate a device chang
On Mon 04. Dec - 14:49:58, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Add 2 sysfs files for user interface.
> 1) docked - 1/0 (read only) - indicates whether the software believes the
> laptop is docked in a docking station.
> 2) undock - (write only) - writing to this file caus
On Mon 13. Nov - 11:54:23, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:14:37 +
> Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:07:37PM +0100, Holger Macht wrote:
> >
> > > I'm currently looking at docking
On Mon 13. Nov - 19:50:25, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 08:43:27PM +0100, Holger Macht wrote:
>
> > What I'm doing at the moment (for about a week ;-) is to echo "- - -" to
> > /sys/class/scsi_host/host*/scan for all unoccupied hosts on a dock
On Mon 13. Nov - 12:14:37, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:07:37PM +0100, Holger Macht wrote:
>
> > I'm currently looking at docking station support for various
> > laptops/vendors and what can be done to get them working. At the moment,
> > users
Hi,
> commit 5669021e40964303994a20633548732c6bb26636
> Author: Kristen Carlson Accardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue Aug 1 14:59:19 2006 -0700
>
> PCI: docking station: remove dock uevents
>
> Remove uevent dock notifications. There are no consumers
> of these events at present,
On Wed 11. Oct - 20:10:27, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 13:32:35 +0200
> Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > @@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ config ACPI_ASUS
> > config ACPI_IBM
> > tristate "IBM ThinkPad Laptop Extras"
> > dep
.
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
index f0bd84a..d9bb370 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
@@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ config ACPI_IBM_DOCK
config ACPI_TOSHIBA
tristate "Toshiba La
Add support for the generic backlight interface below
/sys/class/backlight. The patch keeps the procfs brightness handling for
backward compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
index 19b0d22..f0bd84a 100644
related methods.
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This is an updated version of the patch earlier sent which selects the
right Kconfig option BACKLIGHT_DEVICE.
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
index 0f9d4be..19b0d22 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
related methods.
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
index 0f9d4be..6e47501 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
@@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ config ACPI_ASUS
config ACPI_IBM
tristate "IBM Thin
On Sun 01. Oct - 17:19:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:08:10 +0200
> Alessandro Guido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Make the sony_acpi use the backlight subsystem to adjust brightness value
> > instead of using the /proc/sony/brightness file.
> > (Other settings will still hav
On Wed 17. May - 11:41:16, Brown, Len wrote:
>
> >> I installed SL10.1 today on a P3M laptop (Dell D600)
> >> and it defaults to the "Powersave" scheme which includes
> >> "Dynamic Frequency Scaling" (ondemand), so that is good.
> >>
> >> However, by defaulit "Allow Throttling" is CHECKED
> >> a
On Wed 17. May - 00:20:12, Brown, Len wrote:
>
> >> >> I'm happy to see that clock throttling is not enabled by
> >> >> default in recent SuSE release, at least on my laptop
> >> >> which supports P-states.
> >> >>
> >> >> I'd like to see no option to enable clock-throttling on
> >> >> systems t
On Sat 08. Apr - 23:06:54, Brown, Len wrote:
> >On Sat 08. Apr - 02:42:12, Brown, Len wrote:
> >> Timo, Holger,
> >> Andi pointed me to your FOSDEM Linux Power Management presentation:
> >>
> >> http://en.opensuse.org/FOSDEM2006
> >>
> >> http://files.opensuse.org/opensuse/en/b/b5/One_step_opende
On Sat 08. Apr - 02:42:12, Brown, Len wrote:
> Timo, Holger,
> Andi pointed me to your FOSDEM Linux Power Management presentation:
>
> http://en.opensuse.org/FOSDEM2006
>
> http://files.opensuse.org/opensuse/en/b/b5/One_step_opendesign.pdf
>
> And I'm glad to see you working on Linux Power Manag
33 matches
Mail list logo
