Re: 2.6.23-mm1

2007-10-16 Thread Mark Gross
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:40:02PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, 15 October 2007 18:09, Mark Gross wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:32:40PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Friday, 12 October 2007 06:31, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > &g

Re: 2.6.23-mm1

2007-10-16 Thread Mark Gross
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:28:13PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 21:58, Mark Gross wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:40:02PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Monday, 15 October 2007 18:09, Mark Gross wrote: > > > > On F

[PATCH] static initialization and blocking notification for pm_qos... was Re: 2.6.23-mm1

2007-10-17 Thread Mark Gross
ocking in hopes of fixing the WARNS reported by xxx, and it changes the initialization to me largely static to avoid initialization race with cpu-idle. I think we will have to re-visit the static vrs dynamic initialization and this init race in a while to support pm_qos parameters per power domain (i.e.

[PATCH] static initialization with blocking notifiers. was :wqRe: 2.6.23-mm1

2007-10-17 Thread Mark Gross
I didn't see my patch show up on the list so I'm resending it. On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 01:53:48AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, 17 October 2007 01:31, Mark Gross wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:28:13PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On

Re: Ottawa Linux Power Management Summit, June 25-26, 2007

2007-06-01 Thread Mark Gross
> Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Fedora Maintainer, Linux Kernel Cpufreq Maintainer > Len wants Dave to lead a candid discussion on > the lessons learned from cpufreq. > > Mark Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Intel OTC embedde