On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 00:13 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > It doesn't punish them. They're the ones who are going to work with us
> > to ensure that Linux works on their hardware, and their needs are going
>
> And since when we have t
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 15:04 +1000, N J wrote:
> Quick question. My laptop lid is always detected as closed. How do I force
> the state in /proc/acpi/buttons/lid/LID/state (might not be exact path
> because i had to disable acpi on kernel boot to get xorg working) to open?
hi , I am looking for som
Hi Len,
I thought, tell you my last bisect kernel, for find the bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9642
The patch in attach, the reverts (I don't create it, by myself) of
a patch of the snapshot patch-2.6.23-rc7-git4.
Applied on kernel-2.6.23.14 fix completely, my lid button event,
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sergio Monteiro Basto
> >Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 4:43 AM
> >To: acpi devel
> >Subject: backlight regration from kernel 2.6.22 to 2.6.23
> >
>
Hi,
As a quick message to see if any one is ware of this problem.
On kernel 2.6.23 I had a problem with backlight, lid button doesn't
work !
If I boot computer and close lid (to plug other devices like mouse and
network), after a little while when I open lid, I can't get screen anymore , I
have t
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 09:20 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> No idea how could my simple patch cause your problem...
I'm not saying your patch cause the problem , I say when this messages
begging to appears at more or less at same time my blacklight stops to
works, but not saying that is direct relate
Since I begging to see this message on dmesg , when i press lid button ,
I don't have black light
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 10:36 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 08:50 +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> >
> > Remove acpi video debug message.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <[EMAIL PRO
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 00:47 +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The dependency of SUSPEND_SMP on HOTPLUG_CPU is quite unintuitive,
>
> It's not entirely unintuitive. That option's full name is "Support for
> suspend on SMP and hot-pluggable CPUs".
>
I have to give reason to Le
ay 2007 20:11, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > I got this messages warnings, I just found it, after had other problems
> > not related with ACPI, I am been running with this kernels one or two
> > months ago, and I don't had problems, just reporting the situation,
> > could be
I got this messages warnings, I just found it, after had other problems
not related with ACPI, I am been running with this kernels one or two
months ago, and I don't had problems, just reporting the situation,
could be useful anyway.
Thanks,
ACPI Warning (tbfadt-0360): Ignoring BIOS FADT r2 C-sta
Hi forward this message to dri-devel Mailing List, where you could find
more tester on i815 DRI drives .
I hope I don't had made a loop :)
Forwarded Message
From: Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 15:16 +0200, Goulven Guillard wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Since I upgraded to Xorg 6.9 under FC4, I have an acpi problem.
>
>
> First, during rhgb (Fedora's graphical boot interface, which uses X),
I think I remember this bug, you must disable or remove rhgb at boot
time to resolv
On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 22:57 -0400, Lex Neva wrote:
> So, the questions I have:
>
> Is this a problem anyone's seen before?
>
> Is this a bug? If so, is it in linux-ACPI or psmouse (or something
> else)?
>
> Is there anything I can do to get my power savings and still make the
> mouse
> driver
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 22:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 00:33:36 -0500 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is an old bug. It has been happening forever, but I'd love to
> > know how I can help get this tracked down and fixed.
>
> Yes, I've been hitting somethi
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 12:15 +0200, Dominique Michel wrote:
>
> My problem is at I really want to use CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER in the ACPI config.
>
> Cheers,
> Dominique
you should put all this information on bugzilla
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Platform%20Specific%2FHardware
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 23:00 -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> These patches are in test for Linux-2.6.22.
>
Since we have big changes on ACPI for 2.6.21 , why we don't test all at
once (why we don't also include this on 6.21) ?
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptograph
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 21:41 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> >
> > With this quirk I got this oops on hibernate (but computer still
> > working)
>
> Well, strictly speaking it's a warning, not an oops per
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 02:09 +0100, Mathieu Bérard wrote:
> Jeff Garzik a écrit :
> > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >> Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive
> >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178
> >> Submitter : Mathieu Bérard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Status : unknown
> >
>
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 14:34 +0800, Luming Yu wrote:
> Well, enter a acpi bug on bugzilla with acpidump output and dmesg
> attached.
I put my acpidump here
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6419#c65
this is the correct way to post acpidump , or do you prefer binary ?
acpidump send to std
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 07:04 +0100, Pavel Troller wrote:
> Hi!
> I posted the following question, when 2.6.19 was freshly out. However,
> nobody
> has answered. OK, I told myself, let's get things to stabilize, and I waited
> patiently for 2.6.20. Now, the things are absolutely the same, and IMHO
yap Andreas Arens send the patch just for me, I am sending it to the
maling lists.
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 01:38 +, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 19:40 +0100, Andreas Arens wrote:
> > as I see from the dmesg on the Fedora bugzilla, your acpi tables
> > d
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 19:40 +0100, Andreas Arens wrote:
> as I see from the dmesg on the Fedora bugzilla, your acpi tables
> don't provide an entry to the HPET timer.
> As the VIA8237 happens to have a built-in HPET, I was able to force it
> on using the
> attached patch (against 2.6.18) on an X2
may be you need this patch
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc2/2.6.19-rc2-mm2/broken-out/remove-quirk_via_abnormal_poweroff.patch
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 14:02 -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I get the following Opps on my K7 VIA box with acpi=off. I us
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 18:24 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> I've been chasing a bug that got filed against the Fedora kernel
> a while back: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199052
> This is a dual pentium pro from an era before we had ACPI, and
> it seems to be falling foul of this
On Monday 25 September 2006 04:42, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> You should probably file a bug in the kernel bugzilla at
> http://kernel.bugzilla.org and provides lots of info.
Is already in bubzilla
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2874#c22
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
-
To unsubscribe from this
Hi, I think this should be reported on
ACPI mailing list , so I am Forwarding to this list
Forwarded Message
> From: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Brown, Len <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [patch 2.6.18-rc7] ACPI: build warnings beg
Hi, I think this should be reported on
ACPI mailing list , so I am Forwarding to this list
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 19:47 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> I get this message at boot on 2.6.18-rc6:
>
> ACPI Exception (acpi_thermal-0412): AE_NOT_FOUND, Invalid active threshold
> [0] [20060707]
>
> Fo
lue about this problem ?
Forwarded Message
From: Sergio Monteiro Basto
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 01:48:28 +0100
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 23:38 +0200, Stian Jordet wrote:
> On tir, 2006-09-12 at 13:37 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto
ok , quick question what file in kernel do the dmesg line :
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] enabled at IRQ 11
drivers/pci/quirks.c ?
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo i
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 02:00 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 15:54 -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:46:38PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > > yap, in my opinion this function should back to
> >
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 18:39 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> This sounds like just running with CONFIG_IO_APIC=n or using
> "noapic" on the kernel boot command line. If that's what is
> needed, we can know that. I just haven't seen info to know
> what the real problem is.
yes, could be a way, if we
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 16:25 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> No idea about that.
> I think that you still didn't answer my question, or maybe I
> didn't ask it well enough. What device are you having problems
> with? I don't mean what chipset, I mean what device that you
> touch...
>
I'd like to giv
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 15:54 -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:46:38PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
>
> > yap, in my opinion this function should back to
>
> > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_via_irq);
>
>
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 14:29 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 12:56:25 +0100 Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 21:08 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > >
> > > If you have a specific issue/problem, it would probably be
>
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 21:08 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
>
> If you have a specific issue/problem, it would probably be
> better just to focus on that.
on linux-2.6.17/drivers/pci/quirks.c
* we must mask the PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE value versus 0xf to get
* interrupts delivered properly.
*/
who no, how sorry! I am a little tired
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 17:47 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 01:36:46 +0100 Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
>
> > who I do know if a interrupt is ioapic_edge_type or ioapic_edge_type ?
>
> Do you mean how they are confi
who I do know if a interrupt is ioapic_edge_type or ioapic_edge_type ?
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 20:50 +1000, Johny wrote:
> Success :)
>
> I simply made the change
> manually, based on your and others' inputs (it seemed the simpler
> option).
>
> Both kernels now boot, and all USB devices are rec
someone has it has a case similar and said that won't work without
acpi=noirq
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6654
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 16:09 +0400, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:21:35PM +1000, Johny wrote:
> [...]
> > Stock kernels break for me starting with 2.6
Hi,
In first thread of this issue in LKML, some months ago, (right now, I
don't have the link).
After some discussion, someone arrive the conclusion of that:
You only need this quirks, if interrupts are in XT-PIC mode and is
harmless if don't (and "should only run for VIA southbridges"). So if
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 06:15 +0200, Pavel Troller wrote:
> > On my buggy computer i get
> > cat dmesg09 | grep "MM\|MCFG"
> > ACPI: MCFG (v001 A M I OEMMCFG 0x05000602 MSFT 0x0097) @
> > 0x3ffb0410
> > PCI: BIOS Bug: MCFG area is not E820-reserved
> > PCI: Not using MMCONFIG.
> > PC
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/23/213
On my buggy computer i get
cat dmesg09 | grep "MM\|MCFG"
ACPI: MCFG (v001 A M I OEMMCFG 0x05000602 MSFT 0x0097) @
0x3ffb0410
PCI: BIOS Bug: MCFG area is not E820-reserved
PCI: Not using MMCONFIG.
PCI-DMA: Disabling IOMMU.
Should ACPI read MCFG a
Hi,
I experience this "kernel panic during boot" with acpi=off and IIRC
pci=noacpi, but what I like to know if this can resolve any other
problems on my bug: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6419
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6419#c17
btw I will try this patch anyway
Thanks,
ot IO-APIC
Thanks for the report ,
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 22:26 +0200, Paul Surgeon wrote:
> On Monday 29 May 2006 14:11, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > and before ?
> > can you send lspci -n ?
>
> I can send you a lot more than that. :)
> I attached a zip file containing
and before ?
can you send lspci -n ?
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 21:50 +0200, Paul Surgeon wrote:
> I had a problem with ACPI IRQ routing messing up the USB ehci module.
> I have to disable the irq routing with apci=noirq in the bootloader config in
> order to use the ehci module.
>
> Failing to do s
Hi,
Before this matter getting cold, I'd like to tell this:
1º This quirk_via_irq function has been created originally by Bjorn
Helgaas, so maybe he can tell better what patch does.
2º This is need it on a Compaq presario 700 (laptop) that I bought on
year 2002. After new ACPI get some stability
Hi ,
Well I had test latest (at May 14), and don't change much the behavior
of my desktop.
Anyway though might be useful send the diff of dmesg
I have new messages like:
ACPI (acpi_bus-0191): Device is not power manageable [20060310]
ACPI Exception (acpi_memory-0403): AE_ERROR, handle is no mem
ok here it goes the state of applying this 16 patches against 2.6.17-rc4
Patches
1 2 out of date (n out of m hunks FAILED)
3 4 ok
5 out of date
6 ok
7 8 9 10 out of date
11 12 13 ok
14 out of date
15 16 ok
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 02:25 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: "Arnaud Patard" <[
Hi,
I am little out of this but if I may ask
And about this patch:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/17581/match=suppress+power+button
and the others 15, what is the status ?
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 05:18 -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> Folks,
> The latest ACPI patch is against 2.6.17-rc4
I think, it is about time, not thinking via quirks as workarounds,
because all pcis (on via) are quirked, some are quirked twice.
And we should think in programmer interrupts of via chipset, in specific
function for this propose, for me, doesn't make sense every time VIA put
other ID out, we have t
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 19:14 -0400, Kimball Murray wrote:
> Our system uses an ACPI Interrupt Source Override to inform the OS
> that the
> 8254 timer (IRQ0) is on pin 1 of the ioapic. On that same ioapic, pin
> 0
> handles an interrupt from a PCI device. The work-around for the VIA
> chipset
> no
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 21:59 +0800, Yu, Luming wrote:
> >Hi everybody,
> >I have a new laptop one HP Compaq NX6110 , that works quite well with
> >suspend and hibernation.
> >
> >But after suspend , how I bring back computer ?, the only key that I
> >know is power button, but after press power butto
Hi,
unload acpid (service acipd stop) before suspend is more easy and
works.
thanks,
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 11:20 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wednesday 19 April 2006 23:49, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> > I have a new laptop one HP Compa
Hi everybody,
I have a new laptop one HP Compaq NX6110 , that works quite well with
suspend and hibernation.
But after suspend , how I bring back computer ?, the only key that I
know is power button, but after press power button and laptop wake-up,
Begins the shutdown process because is triggered
53 matches
Mail list logo
