Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
[...]
> Subject: ACPI regression with noapic
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/8/468
> Submitter : Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Status : unknown
I finally have time to start bisecting
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:06:57AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:49:15 +0100 Adrian Bunk wrote:
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:06:57AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:49:15 +0100 Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
> >
> > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> > of the bugs, m
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:49:15 +0100 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
>
> If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
> of you caused a
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly involv
