On Thursday, 14 of February 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:31:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
And it's a regression.
No, it's a feature. You've configured in both the legacy and the sysfs
interfaces for the battery, and hal is picking up both of them. There's
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:18:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Can you point me to the patch, please?
I'm running the current mainline and seeing this as well.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/hal/commit/?id=4541abd23fd02118a1a7f8b825aed338d2a5d638
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:31:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
And it's a regression.
No, it's a feature. You've configured in both the legacy and the sysfs
interfaces for the battery, and hal is picking up both of them. There's
a patch upstream to make hal realise that they're the same
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:00:11 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9957
Summary: Battery gives me now two batterys, but only one is
present
yeah, I'm seeing this on the t61p as well, but have thus far ignored it
amongst
