On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 12:06:18PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 11:36 +0800, Len Brown wrote:
> > On Tuesday 31 July 2007 19:00, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC.
> > >
> > > GFP_ATOMIC is still needed by the sonypi and sony-laptop driver.
> >
> > Why?
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 11:36 +0800, Len Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 July 2007 19:00, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC.
> >
> > GFP_ATOMIC is still needed by the sonypi and sony-laptop driver.
>
> Why?
> Sony can't events from user-context like everybody else does?
Mattia h
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 19:00, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> GFP_ATOMIC is still needed by the sonypi and sony-laptop driver.
Why?
Sony can't events from user-context like everybody else does?
I don't like adding this extra param to every caller.
I'm looking forwa
On Wednesday, 1 August 2007 01:00, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC.
Hmm, if any of these things can happen during a suspend, GFP_NOFS would be
safer (or even GFP_NOIO).
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscrib
Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC.
GFP_ATOMIC is still needed by the sonypi and sony-laptop driver.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/acpi/ac.c |3 ++-
drivers/acpi/asus_acpi.c |2 +-
drivers/acpi/battery.c|3 ++-
drivers
