On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 00:56:02 -0500 Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I acked this before, but I guess since it came back
that you're looking for me to check it in and somebody else
is handling the rest of your rtc patch series.
As it is ifdef'd so can't break anything if it goes in
Okay, I acked this before, but I guess since it came back
that you're looking for me to check it in and somebody else
is handling the rest of your rtc patch series.
As it is ifdef'd so can't break anything if it goes in first...
done.
thanks,
-Len
On Monday 05 February 2007 19:09, [EMAIL
From: David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Update ACPI to export its RTC extension information through platform_data
to the PNPACPI or platform bus device node used on the system being set up.
This will need to be updated later to provide a firmware hook to handle
system suspend with an alarm
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:07:34 -0800
David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way ... in case I was unclear about this, this does need to _follow_
the
patch defining the rtc-cmos driver and its platform data. Which I'm sure it
does in the MM tree, as it does in my own patchsets. :)
By the way ... in case I was unclear about this, this does need to _follow_ the
patch defining the rtc-cmos driver and its platform data. Which I'm sure it
does in the MM tree, as it does in my own patchsets. :)
- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
