x60 backlight Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)

2006-10-08 Thread Pavel Machek
On Sat 07-10-06 23:46:21, Adrian Bunk wrote: This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc1 compared to 2.6.18 that are not yet fixed Linus' tree. If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a

Re: x60 backlight Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)

2006-10-08 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 07:12:54AM +, Pavel Machek wrote: On Sat 07-10-06 23:46:21, Adrian Bunk wrote: This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc1 compared to 2.6.18 that are not yet fixed Linus' tree. If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of

Re: x60 backlight Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)

2006-10-08 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting r. Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: x60 backlight Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2) On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 07:12:54AM +, Pavel Machek wrote: On Sat 07-10-06 23:46:21, Adrian Bunk wrote: This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc1

Re: x60 backlight Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)

2006-10-08 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 06:36:02PM +, Pavel Machek wrote: On Sun 08-10-06 19:38:09, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 07:12:54AM +, Pavel Machek wrote: On Sat 07-10-06 23:46:21, Adrian Bunk wrote: This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc1 compared to

Re: x60 backlight Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)

2006-10-08 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 07:59:58PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: Quoting r. Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: x60 backlight Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2) On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 07:12:54AM +, Pavel Machek wrote: On Sat 07-10-06 23:46:21, Adrian

Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions (v2)

2006-10-07 Thread Trond Myklebust
Cc: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux Kernel Mailing List linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Prakash Punnoor [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED], netdev@vger.kernel.org, Michael S.

Re: 2.6.19-rc1: known regressions

2006-10-05 Thread Nigel Cunningham
Hi. On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 06:28 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Contrary to popular belief, there are people who test -rc kernels and report bugs. And there are even people who test -git kernels. Slightly off topic, but let me report a metoo as far as testing -git goes (you can even find a

2.6.19-rc1: known regressions

2006-10-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
Contrary to popular belief, there are people who test -rc kernels and report bugs. And there are even people who test -git kernels. This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc1 compared to 2.6.18. If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one of the bugs,