Re: 2.6.21-rc[123] regression with NOAPIC

2007-03-22 Thread Ray Lee
Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 15:16 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: Does it work if you do _not_ revert the commits, and instead replace in drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c the #ifdef ARCH_APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3 with an #if 0 ? >>> Then NOAPIC probably works

Re: 2.6.21-rc[123] regression with NOAPIC

2007-03-22 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 15:16 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Does it work if you do _not_ revert the commits, and instead replace in > > > drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c the > > > #ifdef ARCH_APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3 > > > with an > > > #if 0 > > > ? > > > > Then NOAPIC probably works again, but bo

Re: 2.6.21-rc[123] regression with NOAPIC

2007-03-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:10:03PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 14:42 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Starting with head as of yesterday and reverting two commits (that are > > > duplicates of each other -- the same commit came into Linus's tree via > > > two different path

Re: 2.6.21-rc[123] regression with NOAPIC

2007-03-22 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 14:42 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Starting with head as of yesterday and reverting two commits (that are > > duplicates of each other -- the same commit came into Linus's tree via > > two different paths) 'fixes' the problem for me. I'll let those with the > > big brains dec

Re: 2.6.21-rc[123] regression with NOAPIC

2007-03-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:03:06AM -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > Hey Thomas, Ingo, et al. > > I'm having a problem, and tracked it down to what looks like a harmless > commit of yours. I didn't quite believe the bisect at first, so tested > it multiple times. > > The original problem report, when I boo