On Thursday 09 August 2007 01:52:37 Frank Hale wrote:
> I have the latest BIOS update for my laptop which is buggy I suppose.
> There has been only one update this year if my memory serves me
> correctly. Is there any hope to fix this or am I at the mercy of the
> hardware vendor which apparenlty d
Frank Hale wrote:
I have the latest BIOS update for my laptop which is buggy I suppose.
There has been only one update this year if my memory serves me
correctly. Is there any hope to fix this or am I at the mercy of the
hardware vendor which apparenlty doesn't look like they will release
another
I have the latest BIOS update for my laptop which is buggy I suppose.
There has been only one update this year if my memory serves me
correctly. Is there any hope to fix this or am I at the mercy of the
hardware vendor which apparenlty doesn't look like they will release
another patch this year. Pl
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 02:06:31 Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 06:15:37PM -0400, Cal Peake wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > MSR_K8_ENABLE_C1E lo == 0x04c14015
> > > > MSR_K8_ENABLE_C1E hi == 0x
> > > > lo & ENABLE_C1E_MASK == 0
> > >
> > > And y
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 06:15:37PM -0400, Cal Peake wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > > MSR_K8_ENABLE_C1E lo == 0x04c14015
> > > MSR_K8_ENABLE_C1E hi == 0x
> > > lo & ENABLE_C1E_MASK == 0
> >
> > And yeah, that claims that C1E is not on, but:
> >
> > > amd_apic_tim
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > MSR_K8_ENABLE_C1E lo == 0x04c14015
> > MSR_K8_ENABLE_C1E hi == 0x
> > lo & ENABLE_C1E_MASK == 0
>
> And yeah, that claims that C1E is not on, but:
>
> > amd_apic_timer_broken: forcing return value of 1
So it seems my initial debugging report
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 11:30 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > amd_apic_timer_broken: forcing return value of 1
> What exact type of machine is it?
FYI: There seem to be a very wide range of Turion machines affected by
the latest no_hz/time/clockevents changes.
Tim Gardner reported a hang while booti
> What exact type of machine is it?
Not sure which one Cal has but I have an Averatec 2370 12inch laptop
with an nVidia MCP51 chipset.
AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-50
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > amd_apic_timer_broken: forcing return value of 1
>
> since this makes it all work for you, it does appear that the AMD local
> timer stops in C1 even when that isn't true, and as such is not useful.
Probably messed up SMM code. Might not apply to all AMD CPUs.
> Sad. It probably means that
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Cal Peake wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > That said, the "AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52" _should_ be
> > a REV-F CPU afaik, and it should have thus fallen through to the
> > "ENABLE_C1E_MASK" logic. Afaik that's broken.
> >
> > Cal
On 08/03/2007 11:52 AM, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> This is the same problem I'm seeing (See Subject: Regression in 2.6.22,
> clock problems on Turion with 32-bit kernel).
>
> This commit is what we bisected to:
>
> commit e9e2cdb412412326c4827fc78ba27f410d837e6e
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PRO
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 14:07 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Cal Peake wrote:
> >
> > Figured I should have sent that right after I hit the send key...
> >
> > processor : 0
> > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
> > cpu family : 15
> > model : 72
> > model name : A
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Cal Peake wrote:
> >
> > Figured I should have sent that right after I hit the send key...
> >
> > processor : 0
> > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
> > cpu family : 15
> > model : 72
> > model name : AMD Turion(tm) 64
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Cal Peake wrote:
>
> Figured I should have sent that right after I hit the send key...
>
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
> cpu family: 15
> model : 72
> model name: AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-52
Sadly, this doesn't show the
Here is my /proc/cpuinfo, I have SMP disabled at the moment. Looks
like my model is slightly older than Cal's.
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 15
model : 72
model name : AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-50
stepping: 2
cpu MHz
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 08/02/2007 03:42 PM, Cal Peake wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> >
> >> Try the 'nolapic_timer' option.
> >
> > Ah, thank you Chuck! This looks to have fixed the stalling/hanging
> > problems I was having.
> >
> > Now I'm wonderin
On 08/02/2007 03:42 PM, Cal Peake wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>
>> On 08/02/2007 01:50 PM, Cal Peake wrote:
>>> This problem seems to be getting worse. With the latest linus tree, after
>>> the initial hang where the power button is needed to bring the system back
>>> to lif
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 08/02/2007 01:50 PM, Cal Peake wrote:
> > This problem seems to be getting worse. With the latest linus tree, after
> > the initial hang where the power button is needed to bring the system back
> > to life, the boot process slows to a crawl.
> >
> >
On 08/02/2007 01:50 PM, Cal Peake wrote:
> This problem seems to be getting worse. With the latest linus tree, after
> the initial hang where the power button is needed to bring the system back
> to life, the boot process slows to a crawl.
>
> Although if I repeatedly press the shift key it'll h
This problem seems to be getting worse. With the latest linus tree, after
the initial hang where the power button is needed to bring the system back
to life, the boot process slows to a crawl.
Although if I repeatedly press the shift key it'll help move things along.
I'm guessing the keyboard i
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Gabriel C wrote:
> Frank Hale wrote:
> [ added linux-acpi to CC ]
> > I have an Averatec 2370 laptop with the nVidia MCP51. With kernel
> > 2.6.20 I had no issues with ACPI however with 2.6.21 and higher the
> > kernel will hang on boot until I press the suspend button or the
Your work around seems to do the trick. I took out SMP support, added
ACPI and now it boots normally.
On 7/29/07, Frank Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Frank, can you try a non-SMP build with ACPI and see if you still have the
> > problem?
>
> I certainly will, I never tried it without it so n
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Gabriel C wrote:
> Frank Hale wrote:
> [ added linux-acpi to CC ]
> > I have an Averatec 2370 laptop with the nVidia MCP51. With kernel
> > 2.6.20 I had no issues with ACPI however with 2.6.21 and higher the
> > kernel will hang on boot until I press the suspend button or the
> Frank, can you try a non-SMP build with ACPI and see if you still have the
> problem?
I certainly will, I never tried it without it so now I am curious.
Thanks a bunch!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majo
Frank Hale wrote:
[ added linux-acpi to CC ]
> I have an Averatec 2370 laptop with the nVidia MCP51. With kernel
> 2.6.20 I had no issues with ACPI however with 2.6.21 and higher the
> kernel will hang on boot until I press the suspend button or the power
> button in which case the kernel wakes up
25 matches
Mail list logo
