On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 11:17:19PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ar Iau, 2006-10-19 am 16:11 -0400, ysgrifennodd Dave Jones:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:16:44PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > > Why smp_found_config isn't set in that guys configuration is a mystery
> > to me,
> > > as his
Ar Iau, 2006-10-19 am 16:11 -0400, ysgrifennodd Dave Jones:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:16:44PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > Why smp_found_config isn't set in that guys configuration is a mystery to
> me,
> > as his MPS tables look sane..
> >
> > MP Table:
> > # APIC ID Version State
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:16:44PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> Why smp_found_config isn't set in that guys configuration is a mystery to me,
> as his MPS tables look sane..
>
> MP Table:
> #APIC ID Version State Family Model StepFlags
> # 0 0x10BSP, usable
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 01:33:40AM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 October 2006 18:24, Dave Jones wrote:
> > I've been chasing a bug that got filed against the Fedora kernel
> > a while back: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199052
> > This is a dual pentium pro f
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 18:24, Dave Jones wrote:
> I've been chasing a bug that got filed against the Fedora kernel
> a while back: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199052
> This is a dual pentium pro from an era before we had ACPI, and
> it seems to be falling foul of thi
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 12:48:07AM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 18:24 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > I've been chasing a bug that got filed against the Fedora kernel
> > a while back: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199052
> > This is a dual pe
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 18:24 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> I've been chasing a bug that got filed against the Fedora kernel
> a while back: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199052
> This is a dual pentium pro from an era before we had ACPI, and
> it seems to be falling foul of this
