Linux-Advocacy Digest #485

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #485, Volume #25Fri, 3 Mar 00 01:13:08 EST Contents: \\..SAY A PRAYER FOR THE INNOCENT VICTIMS OF BLACK VIOLENCE AND LAWLESSNESS!!!/// ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Re: I can't stand this X anymore! (Hal Burgiss) Re: How does the free-OS business model work? (Mike K

Linux-Advocacy Digest #484

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #484, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 23:13:07 EST Contents: Re: Absolute failure of Linux dead ahead? (Christopher Browne) Re: How does the free-OS business model work? (Donovan Rebbechi) Re: Clarification of the word "communism", re LINUX = COMUNISM more... (Chri

Linux-Advocacy Digest #483

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #483, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 22:13:03 EST Contents: Re: Absolute failure of Linux dead ahead? (David T. Blake) Re: Giving up on NT ("LP") Re: Giving up on NT ("Todd") Linux business proposal, help me please !!! (peter) Re: Absolute failure of Linux dea

Linux-Advocacy Digest #482

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #482, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 20:13:06 EST Contents: Re: Clarification of the word "communism", re LINUX = COMUNISM more... (Donovan Rebbechi) Re: How does the free-OS business model work? (Mike Kenzie) Re: Absolute failure of Linux dead ahead? Re: Absol

Linux-Advocacy Digest #481

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #481, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 19:13:06 EST Contents: Re: How does the free-OS business model work? (JEDIDIAH) Re: Symbolic Links for WinBlows 2000 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Re: Clarification of the word "communism", re LINUX = COMUNISM more... (Mark S. Bilk) Re

Linux-Advocacy Digest #480

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #480, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 18:13:10 EST Contents: Re: Free Internet denied to Linux users (Arthur) Re: Windows 2000 is pretty reliable ("Chad Myers") Re: 64-Bit Linux On Intel Itanium (was: Microsoft's New Motto ("Chad Myers") Re: 64-Bit Linux On Intel

Linux-Advocacy Digest #479

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #479, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 17:13:04 EST Contents: Re: How does the free-OS business model work? (Donovan Rebbechi) Re: 64-Bit Linux On Intel Itanium (was: Microsoft's New Motto (Craig Kelley) Re: Microsoft migrates Hotmail to W2K (Stanislav Kogan) Re:

Linux-Advocacy Digest #478

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #478, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 17:13:04 EST Contents: Re: Absolute failure of Linux dead ahead? (Jon) "Think Different" mascots: why not Wendy Carlos? :) (WaD) Re: How does the free-OS business model work? (JEDIDIAH) Re: Absolute failure of Linux dead ahea

Linux-Advocacy Digest #477

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #477, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 16:13:07 EST Contents: Re: My Windows 2000 experience (Donn Miller) Re: 64-Bit Linux On Intel Itanium (was: Microsoft's New Motto (JEDIDIAH) Re: 64-Bit Linux On Intel Itanium (5X3) Re: 64-Bit Linux On Intel Itanium (5X3) Re

Linux-Advocacy Digest #476

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #476, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 15:13:08 EST Contents: Re: 64-Bit Linux On Intel Itanium (was: Microsoft's New Motto (JEDIDIAH) Re: How does the free-OS business model work? (JEDIDIAH) Re: 64-Bit Linux On Intel Itanium (5X3) Re: Fairness to Winvocates (was

Linux-Advocacy Digest #475

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #475, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 15:13:08 EST Contents: Re: My Windows 2000 experience (JEDIDIAH) Re: How does the free-OS business model work? (Donovan Rebbechi) Re: Giving up on NT (JEDIDIAH) Symbolic Links for WinBlows 2000 (Dave Pitts) Re: 63000 bugs i

Linux-Advocacy Digest #474

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #474, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 14:13:10 EST Contents: Re: Windows 2000 is pretty reliable ("Joseph T. Adams") Re: 64-Bit Linux On Intel Itanium (was: Microsoft's New Motto (JEDIDIAH) Re: Windows 2000 is pretty reliable ("Paul Voller") Re: 64-Bit Linux On I

Linux-Advocacy Digest #473

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #473, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 13:13:08 EST Contents: Re: Windows 2000 Server Sees Rapid Internet Adoption ("Drestin Black") Re: Fragmentation will kill Linux :( (JoeX1029) Re: Windows 2000 has 63,000 bugs - Win2k.html [0/1] - Win2k.html [0/1] ("D. Butler")

Linux-Advocacy Digest #472

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #472, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 12:13:06 EST Contents: Bill Gates just cant win (Meethune) Re: Binary compatibility: what kind of crack are they smoking? (Michael C. Vergallen) Re: Needed: A General Solution For The Lib/Distro Version Problem (was: Binary co

Linux-Advocacy Digest #471

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #471, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 11:13:07 EST Contents: Re: Absolute failure of Linux dead ahead? (Anders Larsen) Re: 64-Bit Linux On Intel Itanium (was: Microsoft's New Motto (The Ghost In The Machine) Re: Dell picks Linux over Windows 2000 for dellhost.com

Linux-Advocacy Digest #470

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #470, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 09:13:04 EST Contents: Re: Fairness to Winvocates (was Re: Microsoft migrates Hotmail to W2K) (Edward Rosten) Re: Fairness to Winvocates (was Re: Microsoft migrates Hotmail to W2K) (Edward Rosten) Re: 64-Bit Linux On Intel It

Linux-Advocacy Digest #469

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #469, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 06:13:05 EST Contents: Re: Microsoft's New Motto ("Neil") Re: Linux Gets Worldwide Recognition ("doc rogers") Re: Linux Gets Worldwide Recognition ("doc rogers") Re: Windows on Linux? (Sascha Bohnenkamp) Re: Why waste time

Linux-Advocacy Digest #468

2000-03-02 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #468, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 06:13:05 EST Contents: Re: Windows 2000 Server Sees Rapid Internet Adoption (Jim Richardson) Re: Dell picks Linux over Windows 2000 for dellhost.com (petilon) Re: Windows 2000: flat sales ("Erik Funkenbusch") Re: Fairness to