Linux-Advocacy Digest #228

2001-06-14 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #228, Volume #35 Thu, 14 Jun 01 09:13:02 EDT Contents: Re: Why homosexuals are no threat to heterosexuals (Burkhard =?iso-8859-1?Q?W=F6lfel?=) Re: Why homosexuals are no threat to heterosexuals (Burkhard =?iso-8859-1?Q?W=F6lfel?=) Re: Why homosexuals are

Linux-Advocacy Digest #228

2001-05-05 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #228, Volume #34Sat, 5 May 01 20:13:05 EDT Contents: Re: The long slow slide to Microsoft.NOT ("Ayende Rahien") Re: Alan Cox responds to Mundie ("Tom Wilson") Re: Linux books ("Mart van de Wege") Re: Blame it all on Microsof

Linux-Advocacy Digest #228

2001-03-31 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #228, Volume #33 Sat, 31 Mar 01 15:13:05 EST Contents: Re: Java, the "Dot-Com" Language? ("2 + 2") Re: I regretfully conclude that Linux is a piece of CRAP. (The Ghost In The Machine) Re: Microsoft abandoning USB? (T. Max Devlin) Re: Ne

Linux-Advocacy Digest #228

2001-02-15 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #228, Volume #32 Fri, 16 Feb 01 02:13:03 EST Contents: Re: Joke of the day - from Microsoft (Charlie Ebert) Re: Interesting article (J Sloan) Re: This is astonishing (MS/DRM/Hardware Control) ("Flacco") Re: This is astonishing (MS/DRM/Hardwa

Linux-Advocacy Digest #228

2001-01-03 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #228, Volume #31Wed, 3 Jan 01 23:13:03 EST Contents: Re: Big government and big business: why not fear both - www.ezboard.com (T. Max Devlin) Re: Uptimes (T. Max Devlin) Re: Conclusion (T. Max Devlin) Re: Why NT? (Donn Miller) Re: Why NT? (R.E.Ballard

Linux-Advocacy Digest #228

2000-11-14 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #228, Volume #30 Tue, 14 Nov 00 06:13:03 EST Contents: Re: Uptime -- where is NT? (Jacques Guy) Re: Uptime -- where is NT? (Ketil Z Malde) Re: Most important computer program in the history of humanity (Ketil Z Malde) Re: NT/2000 true multiuser? (Shane

Linux-Advocacy Digest #228

2000-09-19 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #228, Volume #29 Wed, 20 Sep 00 01:13:03 EDT Contents: Re: How low can they go...? (T. Max Devlin) Re: How low can they go...? (T. Max Devlin) Re: How low can they go...? (T. Max Devlin) Re: Space Shuttle uses Windows software almost exclusively (Trevor

Linux-Advocacy Digest #228

2000-08-04 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #228, Volume #28Fri, 4 Aug 00 18:13:05 EDT Contents: Re: Be OR Linux (Erik Engheim) Re: KDE2 Yahooo!!! (Erik Engheim) Re: Tholen digest, volume 2451760.3556iu^-.1 (tholenbot) Re: Be OR Linux (Milton) Re: Linsux as a desktop platform

Linux-Advocacy Digest #228

2000-06-21 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #228, Volume #27 Wed, 21 Jun 00 13:13:06 EDT Contents: Re: Linux is awesome! (Leslie Mikesell) Re: Goodwin's Law invoked - Thread now dead ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Re: Why We Should Be Nice To Windows Users -was- Neologism of the day ("Rich C"

Linux-Advocacy Digest #228

2000-04-23 Thread Digestifier
Linux-Advocacy Digest #228, Volume #26 Sun, 23 Apr 00 09:13:06 EDT Contents: Re: on installing software on linux. a worst broken system. (Jim Richardson) Re: on installing software on linux. a worst broken system. (Jim Richardson) Re: which OS is best? (Jim Richardson) Re