Linux-Advocacy Digest #478, Volume #34 Sun, 13 May 01 14:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: W2K/IIS proves itself over Linux/Tux ("Jan Johanson")
Re: W2K/IIS proves itself over Linux/Tux ("Jan Johanson")
Re: W2K/IIS proves itself over Linux/Tux ("Ayende Rahien"
Linux-Advocacy Digest #478, Volume #33 Tue, 10 Apr 01 06:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: US Navy carrier to adopt Win2k infrastructure (Goldhammer)
Re: Baseball (Anonymous)
Re: IA32, was an advocacy rant (Nick Maclaren)
Re: IA32, was an advocacy rant (Nick Maclaren)
Re: Is StarOffice
Linux-Advocacy Digest #478, Volume #32 Sun, 25 Feb 01 21:13:08 EST
Contents:
Re: Microsoft says Linux threatens innovation (T. Max Devlin)
Re: why open source software is better (John Hasler)
Re: Mircosoft Tax ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: why open source software is bett
Linux-Advocacy Digest #478, Volume #31 Mon, 15 Jan 01 06:13:02 EST
Contents:
Re: Windows 2000 ("Tom Wilson")
Re: Red hat becoming illegal? ("Chad Myers")
Re: Delphi Forums Downgrading from Windows 2000 to NT 4.0 ("Chad Myers")
Re: Linux 2.4 Maj
Linux-Advocacy Digest #478, Volume #30 Mon, 27 Nov 00 21:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: Whistler review. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Whistler review. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Whistler review. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Whistler review. (Curtis)
Re: Whistler re
Linux-Advocacy Digest #478, Volume #29Thu, 5 Oct 00 23:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: Because programmers hate users (Re: Why are Linux UIs so crappy?) (Richard)
Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...) (STATIC66)
Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes
Linux-Advocacy Digest #478, Volume #28 Fri, 18 Aug 00 12:13:06 EDT
Contents:
Re: Anonymous Wintrolls and Authentic Linvocates - Re: R.E. Ballard says Linux
growth stagnating (Donal K. Fellows)
Re: Am I the only one that finds this just a little scary? (John Sanders)
Re: Is the
Linux-Advocacy Digest #478, Volume #27Wed, 5 Jul 00 17:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: Just exactly what IS Linux, anyway?
Re: Anyone actually using Linux for DTP? (Gene Kimzey)
Re: Linsux as a desktop platform ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linsux as a desktop platform ([EMAIL PROTECTED
Linux-Advocacy Digest #478, Volume #26 Fri, 12 May 00 13:13:07 EDT
Contents:
Re: Things Linux can't do! (Tim Kelley)
Re: Things Linux can't do! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Things Linux can't do! (Tim Kelley)
Re: Why only Microsoft should be allowed to create sof
Linux-Advocacy Digest #478, Volume #25Thu, 2 Mar 00 17:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: Absolute failure of Linux dead ahead? (Jon)
"Think Different" mascots: why not Wendy Carlos? :) (WaD)
Re: How does the free-OS business model work? (JEDIDIAH)
Re: Absolute failure of
10 matches
Mail list logo