Re: [PATCH 1/3] hvc_dcc: Fix bad code generation by marking assembly volatile

2011-01-02 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! diff --git a/drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c b/drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c index 6470f63..155ec10 100644 --- a/drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c +++ b/drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c @@ -33,8 +33,7 @@ static inline u32 __dcc_getstatus(void) { u32 __ret; - - asm(mrc p14, 0, %0, c0, c1, 0 @ read

Re: [PATCH 1/3] hvc_dcc: Fix bad code generation by marking assembly volatile

2011-01-02 Thread David Brown
On Sun, Jan 02 2011, Pavel Machek wrote: diff --git a/drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c b/drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c index 6470f63..155ec10 100644 --- a/drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c +++ b/drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c @@ -33,8 +33,7 @@ static inline u32 __dcc_getstatus(void) { u32 __ret; - -

Re: [PATCH 1/7] msm: io: I/O register definitions for MSM8960

2011-01-02 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:04:11AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: On Fri, 24 Dec 2010, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Friday 17 December 2010, David Brown wrote: I'm not sure really what to do about PHYS_OFFSET. This is kind of the big thing that has kept us so far from making our SOCs multiply

Re: [PATCH 1/7] msm: io: I/O register definitions for MSM8960

2011-01-02 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:04:11AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: On Fri, 24 Dec 2010, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Friday 17 December 2010, David Brown wrote: I'm not sure really what to do about PHYS_OFFSET. This is kind of the big