Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] nvmem: Add a simple NVMEM framework for nvmem providers

2015-06-23 Thread Pantelis Antoniou
Hi Joe, > On Jun 23, 2015, at 05:52 , Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 00:08 +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: >> This patch adds just providers part of the framework just to enable easy >> review. > [] >> include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 54 ++ > > Unless there are going to be

Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] Add simple NVMEM Framework via regmap.

2015-05-26 Thread Pantelis Antoniou
Hi Srinivas, > On May 26, 2015, at 12:12 , Srinivas Kandagatla > wrote: > > Hi Pantelis, > > On 25/05/15 17:51, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >> Hi Srinivas, >> >>> On May 21, 2015, at 19:42 , Srinivas Kandagatla >>> wrote: >>> >&

Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] Add simple NVMEM Framework via regmap.

2015-05-25 Thread Pantelis Antoniou
Hi Srinivas, > On May 21, 2015, at 19:42 , Srinivas Kandagatla > wrote: > > Thankyou all for providing inputs and comments on previous versions of this > patchset. > Here is the v5 of the patchset addressing all the issues raised as > part of previous versions review. > > [snip] I tried t

Re: [PATCH] of/lib: Export fdt routines to modules

2013-10-18 Thread Pantelis Antoniou
fdt and a fdt > that's simply missing the right information. Without error > codes, I think we lose this aspect. > >>> Would people entertain changing this API >>> (and implicitly __unflatten_device_tree) to return errors? I'm >>> guessing the reason it