On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:04:11AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Fri, 24 Dec 2010, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 17 December 2010, David Brown wrote:
I'm not sure really what to do about PHYS_OFFSET. This is kind of the
big thing that has kept us so far from making our SOCs multiply
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:04:11AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Fri, 24 Dec 2010, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 17 December 2010, David Brown wrote:
I'm not sure really what to do about PHYS_OFFSET. This is kind of the
big
On Friday 17 December 2010, David Brown wrote:
I agree with this goal, and I think I have a plan to get us there.
For example, the iomap constants. To fix this, this data needs to be
moved into platform data, or something similar. It seems to me to
make the most sense to move the
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:37:19PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Yes, I understand that it's hard for many reasons, but my impression
is that there is a general agreement on the idea. As I said, I don't
expect you to fix it all at once, but it shouldn't be too hard
to take care when adding new
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 04:31:11PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 15 December 2010, Stepan Moskovchenko wrote:
In this particular case, it's rather confusing, because one would assume
that MSM8960 is a subset of MSM8X60!
Unfortunately, this is not the case, and I'm not sure what
