Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add support for host assisted background operations

2013-07-19 Thread Sujit Reddy Thumma
I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates. Do you think it's helpful for power management? How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm? I'm testing and I can introduce soon. Well, I am thinking on following approach when we introduce power management. ufshcd_runtime_suspend() {

RE: [PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add support for host assisted background operations

2013-07-19 Thread Seungwon Jeon
On Thu, July 18, 2013, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote: > >>> > >I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates. > >>> > >Do you think it's helpful for power management? > >>> > >How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm? > >>> > >I'm testing and I can introduce soon. > >> > > >> >Well, I am thinkin

Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add support for host assisted background operations

2013-07-17 Thread Sujit Reddy Thumma
> >I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates. > >Do you think it's helpful for power management? > >How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm? > >I'm testing and I can introduce soon. > >Well, I am thinking on following approach when we introduce >power management. > >ufshcd_runtime_

RE: [PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add support for host assisted background operations

2013-07-17 Thread Seungwon Jeon
On Thu, July 11, 2013, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote: > On 7/10/2013 7:01 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > > I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates. > > Do you think it's helpful for power management? > > How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm? > > I'm testing and I can introduce soon. > > W

Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add support for host assisted background operations

2013-07-11 Thread Sujit Reddy Thumma
On 7/10/2013 7:01 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote: I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates. Do you think it's helpful for power management? How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm? I'm testing and I can introduce soon. Well, I am thinking on following approach when we introduce power man

RE: [PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add support for host assisted background operations

2013-07-10 Thread Seungwon Jeon
I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates. Do you think it's helpful for power management? How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm? I'm testing and I can introduce soon. On Tue, July 09, 2013, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote: > Background operations in the UFS device can be disabled by > the

Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add support for host assisted background operations

2013-07-09 Thread merez
Tested-by: Maya Erez > Background operations in the UFS device can be disabled by > the host to reduce the response latency of transfer requests. > Add support for enabling/disabling the background operations > during runtime suspend/resume of the device. > > If the device is in critical need of

[PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add support for host assisted background operations

2013-07-09 Thread Sujit Reddy Thumma
Background operations in the UFS device can be disabled by the host to reduce the response latency of transfer requests. Add support for enabling/disabling the background operations during runtime suspend/resume of the device. If the device is in critical need of BKOPS it will raise an URGENT_BKOP