Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] QCOM 8074 cpuidle driver

2014-09-11 Thread Lina Iyer
On Thu, Sep 11 2014 at 00:55 -0600, Pramod Gurav wrote: Hi Lina, With your patchset on top of 3.17-rc4 with v9 of ARM generic idle states patches from Lorenzo I have tested cpuidle on dragonboard8974 with Linaro test suites. All testcases report pass. Also verified manually through sysfs to see

Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] QCOM 8074 cpuidle driver

2014-09-10 Thread Pramod Gurav
Hi Lina, With your patchset on top of 3.17-rc4 with v9 of ARM generic idle states patches from Lorenzo I have tested cpuidle on dragonboard8974 with Linaro test suites. All testcases report pass. Also verified manually through sysfs to see changes in usage count and other details about each state

[PATCH v5 0/7] QCOM 8074 cpuidle driver

2014-09-04 Thread Lina Iyer
Changes since v4: [ https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org/msg10327.html ] - Update to the v8 of ARM generic idle states patches - Use platform device model for cpuidle-qcom - Clean up msm-pm.c to remove unnecessary include files and functions - Update commit text and documentat