On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, Mark Rutland wrote:
static void __init msm_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
{
+ int cpu, map;
+ unsigned int flags = 0;
+
+ for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
+ map = cpu_logical_map(cpu);
+ if (map ARRAY_SIZE(cold_boot_flags)) {
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:55:31PM +0100, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
On 8/12/2013 8:50 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi,
Apologies for the long delay for review on this.
I really like the direction this is going, but I have some qualms with
the implementation.
Thanks for your review, but a few
On 8/12/2013 8:50 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi,
Apologies for the long delay for review on this.
I really like the direction this is going, but I have some qualms with
the implementation.
Thanks for your review, but a few direct recommendations would help in
making the implementation right.
Hi,
Apologies for the long delay for review on this.
I really like the direction this is going, but I have some qualms with
the implementation.
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 03:15:23AM +0100, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
This makes it easy to add SMP support for new targets
by adding cpus property and the
This makes it easy to add SMP support for new targets
by adding cpus property and the release sequence.
We add the enable-method property for the cpus property to
specify which release sequence to use.
While at it, add the 8660 cpus bindings to make SMP work.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani
