On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:03:05PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:33:25PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 07:07:20PM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
@@ -636,6 +646,11 @@ static int keep_initrd;
void free_initrd_mem(unsigned long start,
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 02:35:29AM +, Wang, Yalin wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Catalin Marinas [mailto:catalin.mari...@arm.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 8:03 PM
To: Russell King - ARM Linux
Cc: Wang, Yalin; 'linux...@kvack.org'; Will Deacon; 'linux-
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 12:05:06PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:03:05PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:33:25PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 07:07:20PM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
@@ -636,6 +646,11 @@ static
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 05:07:45PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 12:05:06PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
Care to submit this as a proper patch? We should at least fix Peter's issue
before doing things like extending headers, which won't work for older
kernels anyway.
On 5 December 2014 at 17:27, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 05:07:45PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 12:05:06PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
Care to submit this as a proper patch? We should at least fix Peter's issue
before
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 05:27:02PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 05:07:45PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
From 8e317c6be00abe280de4dcdd598d2e92009174b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 16:41:52
On 5 December 2014 at 18:44, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 05:27:02PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
which makes the summary line rather misleading, and I really don't think
we need to do this on ARM for the simple reason that we've been doing it
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:33:25PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 07:07:20PM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
@@ -636,6 +646,11 @@ static int keep_initrd;
void free_initrd_mem(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
if (!keep_initrd) {
+ if
-Original Message-
From: Catalin Marinas [mailto:catalin.mari...@arm.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 8:03 PM
To: Russell King - ARM Linux
Cc: Wang, Yalin; 'linux...@kvack.org'; Will Deacon; 'linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org'; 'linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org'; 'linux-
this patch extend the start and end address of initrd to be page aligned,
so that we can free all memory including the un-page aligned head or tail
page of initrd, if the start or end address of initrd are not page
aligned, the page can't be freed by free_initrd_mem() function.
Signed-off-by:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 07:07:20PM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
this patch extend the start and end address of initrd to be page aligned,
so that we can free all memory including the un-page aligned head or tail
page of initrd, if the start or end address of initrd are not page
aligned, the page
Great!
yeah, you are right,
just keep the change in free_initrd_mem( ) is ok.
we don't need keep reserved memory to be aligned ,
Thanks!
From: Russell King - ARM Linux [li...@arm.linux.org.uk]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 7:33 PM
To: Wang, Yalin
Cc:
12 matches
Mail list logo
