On Thu, July 18, 2013, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote:
I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates.
Do you think it's helpful for power management?
How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm?
I'm testing and I can introduce soon.
Well, I am thinking on following approach when we
I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates.
Do you think it's helpful for power management?
How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm?
I'm testing and I can introduce soon.
Well, I am thinking on following approach when we introduce
power management.
ufshcd_runtime_suspend() {
On Thu, July 11, 2013, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote:
On 7/10/2013 7:01 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates.
Do you think it's helpful for power management?
How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm?
I'm testing and I can introduce soon.
Well, I am
I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates.
Do you think it's helpful for power management?
How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm?
I'm testing and I can introduce soon.
Well, I am thinking on following approach when we introduce
power management.
ufshcd_runtime_suspend() {
On 7/10/2013 7:01 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates.
Do you think it's helpful for power management?
How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm?
I'm testing and I can introduce soon.
Well, I am thinking on following approach when we introduce
power
I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates.
Do you think it's helpful for power management?
How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm?
I'm testing and I can introduce soon.
On Tue, July 09, 2013, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote:
Background operations in the UFS device can be disabled by
the
Tested-by: Maya Erez me...@codeaurora.org
Background operations in the UFS device can be disabled by
the host to reduce the response latency of transfer requests.
Add support for enabling/disabling the background operations
during runtime suspend/resume of the device.
If the device is in